» Articles » PMID: 33826360

Comparison of Conventional Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI Features and Radiomics Signatures With Machine Learning for Diagnosing Microvascular Invasion

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33826360
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to determine the best model for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using conventional gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadoxetate disodium)-enhanced MRI features and radiomics signatures with machine learning. This retrospective study included 269 patients with a postoperative pathologic diagnosis of HCC. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI features were assessed, including T1 relaxation time, tumor margin, tumor size, peritumoral enhancement, peritumoral hypointensity, and ADC. Radiomics models were constructed and validated by machine learning. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection, and radiomics-based LASSO models were constructed with six classifiers. Predictive capability was assessed using the ROC AUC. Histologic examination confirmed MVI in 111 (41.3%) of the 269 patients. ADC value, nonsmooth tumor margin, and 20-minute T1 relaxation time showed diagnostic accuracy with AUC values of 0.850, 0.847, and 0.846, respectively ( < .05 for all). A total of 1395 quantitative imaging features were extracted. In the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) model, the support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and logistic regression (LR) classifiers showed greater diagnostic efficiency for predicting MVI, with AUCs of 0.942, 0.938, and 0.936, respectively ( < .05 for all). ADC value, nonsmooth tumor margin, and 20-minute T1 relaxation time show high diagnostic accuracy for predicting MVI. Radiomics signatures with machine learning can further improve the ability to predict MVI and are best modeled during HBP. The SVM, XGBoost, and LR classifiers may serve as potential biomarkers to evaluate MVI.

Citing Articles

Cross-institutional evaluation of deep learning and radiomics models in predicting microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: validity, robustness, and ultrasound modality efficacy comparison.

Zhang W, Guo Q, Zhu Y, Wang M, Zhang T, Cheng G Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):142.

PMID: 39438929 PMC: 11520182. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00790-9.


Preoperative CT-based intra- and peri-tumoral radiomic models for differentiating benign and malignant tumors of the parotid gland: a two-center study.

Shen Q, Xiang C, Huang K, Xu F, Zhao F, Han Y Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(9):4445-4458.

PMID: 39417193 PMC: 11477817. DOI: 10.62347/AXQW1100.


Leveraging radiomics and AI for precision diagnosis and prognostication of liver malignancies.

Haghshomar M, Rodrigues D, Kalyan A, Velichko Y, Borhani A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1362737.

PMID: 38779098 PMC: 11109422. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362737.


Current status of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: A quantitative review with Radiomics Quality Score.

Brancato V, Cerrone M, Garbino N, Salvatore M, Cavaliere C World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(4):381-417.

PMID: 38313230 PMC: 10835534. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i4.381.


Performances and variability of CT radiomics for the prediction of microvascular invasion and survival in patients with HCC: a matter of chance or standardisation?.

Cannella R, Santinha J, Beaufrere A, Ronot M, Sartoris R, Cauchy F Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(11):7618-7628.

PMID: 37338558 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09852-1.