Self-management of Incontinence Using a Free Mobile App: Factors Associated with Improvement

Overview

Journal Int Urogynecol J

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gynecology & Obstetrics
Urology

Date 2021 Apr 7

PMID 33825925

Citations 7

Authors

Emma Nystrom

Lars Soderstrom

Eva Samuelsson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is first-line treatment for urinary incontinence (UI) in women. Self-management via a mobile app is a new cost-effective method for PFMT delivery. This study analyzes factors associated with improvement among app users.

Methods: A pragmatic observational study in a community setting. Upon downloading the app Tät®, users answered questions regarding their age, education, residence, and UI symptoms. After 3 months, users answered follow-up questions regarding symptoms and frequency of training and app usage, and the validated Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. Only non-pregnant, non-postpartum adult women with UI who answered the PGI-I questionnaire were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze possible associations between these factors with any improvement and with great improvement according to the PGI-I. The models were adjusted for age.

Results: The study included 2,153 participants who had completed self-management, that is, 11.5% of eligible women who completed the baseline questionnaire. Of these participants, 65.6% reported improvement of UI. Any improvement was associated with age, frequency of PFMT, and app use, accounting for 27.9% of variability (Nagelkerke R). Lower incontinence severity, frequency of PFMT, and app use were associated with great improvement.

Conclusion: Self-management of urinary incontinence is easily accessible to many women and improvement rates are comparable with other forms of PFMT. Demographic factors and incontinence severity showed no or incongruent association, whereas regular PFMT and app use predicted any and great improvement. App use showed an additional effect beyond frequency of training.

Citing Articles

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Urogynecology: Current Applications and Future Prospects.

Oliveira M, Mendes F, Martins M, Cardoso P, Fonseca J, Mascarenhas T Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941204 PMC: 11816405. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030274.

Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Model for Bothersome Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Parous Women in Southeastern China.

Wang Q, Jiang X, Li X, Que Y, Lin C Int Urogynecol J. 2024; 36(2):391-401.

PMID: 39585381 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05983-1.

The relation between usage of an eHealth intervention for stress urinary incontinence and treatment outcomes: an observational study.

Firet L, Teunissen T, Kool R, Akkermans R, Lagro-Janssen A, van der Vaart H BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):89.

PMID: 38493288 PMC: 10943843. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02325-4.

Mobile apps to self-manage chronic low back pain: A realist synthesis exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances.

Hunter R, Beattie M, OMalley C, Gorely T PEC Innov. 2024; 3:100175.

PMID: 38213759 PMC: 10782115. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100175.

Mobile Application Based Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Assessor-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Kijmanawat A, Saraluck A, Manonai J, Wattanayingcharoenchai R, Aimjirakul K, Chinthakanan O J Clin Med. 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38002618 PMC: 10672388. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227003.

References

Dumoulin C, Cacciari L, Hay-Smith E . Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 10:CD005654. PMC: 6516955. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005654.pub4. View

Labrie J, Lagro-Janssen A, Fischer K, Berghmans L, van der Vaart C . Predicting who will undergo surgery after physiotherapy for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 26(3):329-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2473-z. View

Obloza A, Teo R, Marriott E, Parker G, Tincello D . Association of baseline severity of lower urinary tract symptoms with the success conservative therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 30(5):705-710. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3778-0. View

Cammu H, Van Nylen M, Blockeel C, Kaufman L, Amy J . Who will benefit from pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(4):1152-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.012. View

Rygh P, Asklund I, Samuelsson E . Real-world effectiveness of app-based treatment for urinary incontinence: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(1):e040819. PMC: 7783523. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040819. View

Bjork A, Sjostrom M, Johansson E, Samuelsson E, Umefjord G . Women's experiences of internet-based or postal treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(4):484-93. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314524486. View

Sjostrom M, Lindholm L, Samuelsson E . Mobile App for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(5):e154. PMC: 5440735. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7383. View

Lukacz E, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo M, Brubaker L . Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Review. JAMA. 2017; 318(16):1592-1604. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.12137. View

Yalcin I, Bump R . Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(1):98-101. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. View

10.

Dumoulin C, Hay-Smith J, Frawley H, McClurg D, Alewijnse D, Bo K . 2014 consensus statement on improving pelvic floor muscle training adherence: International Continence Society 2011 State-of-the-Science Seminar. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015; 34(7):600-5. DOI: 10.1002/nau.22796. View

11.

Burgio K, Goode P, Locher J, Richter H, Roth D, Wright K . Predictors of outcome in the behavioral treatment of urinary incontinence in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102(5 Pt 1):940-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00770-1. View

12.

Lindh A, Sjostrom M, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E . Non-face-to-face treatment of stress urinary incontinence: predictors of success after 1 year. Int Urogynecol J. 2016; 27(12):1857-1865. PMC: 5124436. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3050-4. View

13.

Asklund I, Nystrom E, Sjostrom M, Umefjord G, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E . Mobile app for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016; 36(5):1369-1376. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23116. View

14.

Asklund I, Samuelsson E, Hamberg K, Umefjord G, Sjostrom M . User Experience of an App-Based Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(3):e11296. PMC: 6437616. DOI: 10.2196/11296. View

15.

Richter H, Burgio K, Chai T, Kraus S, Xu Y, Nyberg L . Predictors of outcomes in the treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20(5):489-97. PMC: 3384992. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0805-1. View

16.

Hendriks E, Kessels A, de Vet H, Bernards A, de Bie R . Prognostic indicators of poor short-term outcome of physiotherapy intervention in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009; 29(3):336-43. DOI: 10.1002/nau.20752. View

17.

Xu D, Wang X, Li J, Wang K . The mediating effect of 'bothersome' urinary incontinence on help-seeking intentions among community-dwelling women. J Adv Nurs. 2014; 71(2):315-25. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12514. View

18.

Milne J, Moore K . Factors impacting self-care for urinary incontinence. Urol Nurs. 2006; 26(1):41-51. View

19.

Schaffer J, Nager C, Xiang F, Borello-France D, Bradley C, Wu J . Predictors of success and satisfaction of nonsurgical therapy for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(1):91-7. PMC: 3427534. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825a6de7. View

20.

Barnes K, Dunivan G, Jaramillo-Huff A, Krantz T, Thompson J, Jeppson P . Evaluation of Smartphone Pelvic Floor Exercise Applications Using Standardized Scoring System. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 25(4):328-335. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000563. View