» Articles » PMID: 33825150

Variable and Dose-dependent Response of Saccharomyces and Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Toward Lignocellulosic Hydrolysate Inhibitors

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33825150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lignocellulosic hydrolysates will also contain compounds that inhibit microbial metabolism, such as organic acids, furaldehydes, and phenolic compounds. Understanding the response of yeasts toward such inhibitors is important to the development of different bioprocesses. In this work, the growth capacity of 7 industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 7 non-Saccharomyces yeasts was compared in the presence of 3 different concentrations of furaldehydes (furfural and 5-hydroxymetil-furfural), organic acids (acetic and formic acids), and phenolic compounds (vanillin, syringaldehyde, ferulic, and coumaric acids). Then, Candida tropicalis JA2, Meyerozyma caribbica JA9, Wickerhamomyces anomalus 740, S. cerevisiae JP1, B1.1, and G06 were selected for fermentation in presence of acetic acid, HMF, and vanillin because they proved to be most tolerant to the tested compounds, while Spathaspora sp. JA1 because its xylose consumption rate. The results obtained showed a dose-dependent response of the yeasts toward the eight different inhibitors. Among the compared yeasts, S. cerevisiae strains presented higher tolerance than non-Saccharomyces, 3 of them with the highest tolerance among all. Regarding the non-Saccharomyces yeasts, C. tropicalis JA2 and W. anomalus 740 appeared as the most tolerant, whereas Spathaspora strains appeared very sensitive to the different compounds.

References
1.
Alvira P, Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Negro M . Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101(13):4851-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093. View

2.
Hasunuma T, Kondo A . Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2011; 30(6):1207-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.10.011. View

3.
Almeida J, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund M, Gorsich S, Liden G . Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 82(4):625-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-1875-1. View

4.
Liu Z . Understanding the tolerance of the industrial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae against a major class of toxic aldehyde compounds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018; 102(13):5369-5390. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-8993-6. View

5.
Jonsson L, Martin C . Pretreatment of lignocellulose: Formation of inhibitory by-products and strategies for minimizing their effects. Bioresour Technol. 2015; 199:103-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.009. View