» Articles » PMID: 33823633

Clinical Effect of Brisson Operation Modified by Y-shaped Incision for Treatment of Concealed Penis in Adolescents

Overview
Journal J Int Med Res
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33823633
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of the Brisson operation modified by a Y-shaped incision in treating adolescent concealed penis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 27 adolescents with a concealed penis treated with the Brisson operation modified by a Y-shaped incision in our hospital from January 2017 to March 2020.

Results: The operation went smoothly in all 27 patients. Postoperative foreskin edema occurred in 12 patients and spontaneously resolved within 1 month postoperatively. Two patients developed postoperative retropubic infection. After administering antibiotics and symptomatic treatment, both patients' conditions improved within 1 week. All operations obtained satisfactory results. Postoperatively, when the penis was in a non-erect state, it was clearly exposed without retraction or concealment; thus, demonstrating good surgical results. The prepuce was distributed naturally without obvious accumulation of redundant preputial tissue. The penile scar resembled that after circumcision. The postoperative follow-up period was 6 months, during which no patients developed recurrence.

Conclusion: The Brisson operation modified by a Y-shaped incision is effective for treating a concealed penis in adolescent patients. This technique may relieve the pathological abnormalities and retain the penile skin's integrity to the greatest extent with minimal scarring and a satisfactory appearance.

Citing Articles

Concealed penis: A review of multilevel classification and surgical reconstruction techniques.

Xiang B, Peng J, Shang X, Zu X, Li D BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e470.

PMID: 39877568 PMC: 11771508. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.470.

References
1.
Cubilla A, Velazquez E, Amin M, Epstein J, Berney D, Corbishley C . The World Health Organisation 2016 classification of penile carcinomas: a review and update from the International Society of Urological Pathology expert-driven recommendations. Histopathology. 2017; 72(6):893-904. DOI: 10.1111/his.13429. View

2.
Kim J, Lee D, Park K, Baek M . A novel technique of concealed penis repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 24(2):158-62. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343083. View

3.
Borsellino A, Spagnoli A, Vallasciani S, Martini L, Ferro F . Surgical approach to concealed penis: technical refinements and outcome. Urology. 2007; 69(6):1195-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.065. View

4.
Mirastschijski U, Schwenke C, Melchior S, Cedidi C . [Buried Penis: A Comprehensive Review on Aetiology, Classification and Plastic-Surgical Reconstruction]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017; 49(2):78-84. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-122420. View

5.
Higuchi T, Yamaguchi Y, Wood H, Angermeier K . Evaluation and treatment of adult concealed penis. Curr Urol Rep. 2012; 13(4):277-84. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-012-0255-z. View