» Articles » PMID: 33816627

Methods of Analysis of the Nasal Profile: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Apr 5
PMID 33816627
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The nose is the most prominent structure of the face, influencing facial appearance and profile. Orthodontists have an awareness of facial structures, including nasal morphology, when diagnosing and treatment planning. Maxillofacial surgeons influence facial profile by bimaxillary surgery, improving facial aesthetics and harmony. The aim of this review was to summarize the available methods of analysing nasal morphology and profile, and to assess their complexity. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase using the following search terms: "nasal profile analysis", "nasolabial angle", and "nasal profile cephalometric" in order to select studies providing knowledge on correlations between occlusion and nasal development, differences between skeletal classes, ethnic variability, and differences between the sexes. Studies concerning genetic disorders were excluded. Finally, 17 full-text papers were analysed, which pertained to nasolabial angle, or facial profile including the nose. Data concerning methods, ethnic group, reference landmarks used, and measurements made were extracted and placed in tables. Numerous methods of nasal profile analysis can be found in the literature. These methods describe various numbers of parameters, which have influence on facial aesthetic. Nasal parameters are correlated to skeletal class and nasolabial angle, positions of upper incisors, and maxillary inclination.

Citing Articles

Cephalometric and Photographic Evaluation of the Nasolabial Angle in Orthodontically Treated Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.

Pop S, Bud E, Martha K, Muresan I, Janosi K, Dosa B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2.

PMID: 39857016 PMC: 11763396. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020132.


Correlation of the Upper Nasolabial Angle With Skeletal Patterns and Nasal Morphology in Indian Adults: An Observational Study.

Gupta S, Bajjad A, Sharma A, Ummae Hani S, Kumar A, Pandey V Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68857.

PMID: 39376849 PMC: 11457290. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68857.


Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of the Fränkel manoeuvre to detect the contributing jaw in angle class II division 1 malocclusion.

Spaicyte N, Kozlovskaja K, Smailiene D, Vasiliauskas A, Lopatiene K, Trakiniene G BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1113.

PMID: 39300413 PMC: 11411909. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04789-3.


Investigation of the Relationship between Sagittal Skeletal Nasal Profile Morphology and Malocclusions: A Lateral Cephalometric Film Study.

Ocak Y, Cicek O, Ozkalayci N, Erener H Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766568 PMC: 9914158. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030463.


Relationships between the hard and soft dimensions of the nose in Pan troglodytes and Homo sapiens reveal the positions of the nasal tips of Plio-Pleistocene hominids.

Campbell R, Vinas G, Henneberg M PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0259329.

PMID: 35192639 PMC: 8863275. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259329.

References
1.
Aljabaa A . Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019; 11:9-17. PMC: 6338237. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190230. View

2.
McNamara Jr J . A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86(6):449-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(84)90352-x. View

3.
Paradowska-Stolarz A, Kawala B . The Nasolabial Angle Among Patients with Total Cleft Lip and Palate. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(3):481-5. DOI: 10.17219/acem/28112. View

4.
Clements B . Nasal imbalance and the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod. 1969; 55(4):329-52 contd. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(69)90142-0. View

5.
van Schijndel O, Tasman A, Litschel R . The Nose Influences Visual and Personality Perception. Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 31(5):439-45. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565009. View