» Articles » PMID: 33815221

Maternal and Paternal Representations in Assisted Reproductive Technology and Spontaneous Conceiving Parents: A Longitudinal Study

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Apr 5
PMID 33815221
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim of this study was to investigate whether parental mental representations during pregnancy and after delivery differed between parents who conceived after Assisted Reproductive Treatments (ART) and spontaneous conceiving (SC) parents. Effects of specific ART variables (previous ART attempts, treatment type and cause of infertility) were also taken into account. Seventeen ART couples and 25 SC couples were recruited at Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (Reggio Emilia, Italy). At both 32 weeks of gestation (T1) and 3 months postpartum (T2) participants completed the Semantic Differential of the IRMAG, a self-report tool which measures specific domains of mental representations pertaining either individual (Child, Self-as-woman/man, and Partner) or parental (Self-as-parent, Own parent) characteristics. Results showed that ART parents had significantly more positive representations of the child compared to SC parents, while the scores at Partner dimension improved from T1 to T2 for SC parents only. With regards to ART history, scores at the Self-as-woman/man dimension were significantly less positive for ICSI than IVF parents and improved substantially from T1 to T2 only in case of mothers with previous ART attempts and of fathers at the first ART cycle. The representation of own parents increased from T1 to T2 in case of infertility diagnosis due to male factors, while a decrease emerged when infertility was due to female factors. Findings suggest the need to investigate parental mental representations after ART, in order to improve the understanding on the transition to parenthood of infertile couples and to target more specific intervention for parenting support.

Citing Articles

Fatherhood experiences: A qualitative approach of cisgender and transgender fathers in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) situation with sperm donation.

Mendes N, Woestland L, Drouineaud V, Poirier F, Lagrange C, Rosenblum O Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40501.

PMID: 39650186 PMC: 11625155. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40501.


An Update on the Special Issue "Parent-Child Interactions: Paths of Intergenerational Transmission of Psychopathological Risk".

Cerniglia L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38541327 PMC: 10970055. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030328.


The (decision) tree of fertility: an innovative decision-making algorithm in assisted reproduction technique.

Villani M, Morini D, Spaggiari G, Furini C, Melli B, Nicoli A J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(2):395-408.

PMID: 35084638 PMC: 8793814. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02353-4.


How Does It Feel to Be Online? Psychotherapists' Self-Perceptions in Telepsychotherapy Sessions During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Mancinelli E, Gritti E, Lomoriello A, Salcuni S, Lingiardi V, Boldrini T Front Psychol. 2021; 12:726864.

PMID: 34539529 PMC: 8446272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726864.

References
1.
Monti F, Agostini F, Paterlini M, Andrei F, De Pascalis L, Palomba S . Effects of assisted reproductive technology and of women's quality of life on depressive symptoms in the early postpartum period: a prospective case-control study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31(5):374-8. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.1000850. View

2.
La Sala G, Gallinelli A, Fagandini P, Bevolo P, Landini A, Ballabeni A . Developmental outcomes at one and two years of children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2004; 49(3):113-9. View

3.
Molgora S, Baldini M, Tamanza G, Somigliana E, Saita E . Individual and Relational Well-Being at the Start of an ART Treatment: A Focus on Partners' Gender Differences. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:2027. PMC: 7549400. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02027. View

4.
McLachlan R, OBryan M . Clinical Review#: State of the art for genetic testing of infertile men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(3):1013-24. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-1925. View

5.
Hjelmstedt A, Collins A . Psychological functioning and predictors of father-infant relationship in IVF fathers and controls. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008; 22(1):72-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00537.x. View