» Articles » PMID: 33812852

Peak Inspiratory Flow As a Predictive Therapeutic Biomarker in COPD

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2021 Apr 4
PMID 33812852
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biomarkers in COPD may be clinical (prior exacerbation history), physiologic (FEV), or blood based (eosinophil count or fibrinogen level). Recent interest in using biomarkers to predict response to therapy in clinical practice has emerged. The benefits of inhaled therapy depend on the correct use of the inhaler, including an appropriate inspiratory flow. Of the available delivery systems, dry powder inhalers are unique because they have an internal resistance, are breath actuated, and are flow dependent. Ideally, the user inhales "forcefully" to generate turbulent energy (determined by an individual's inspiratory flow and the resistance of the device) within the device that disaggregates the powder so that the individual inhales the medication particles into the lower respiratory tract. Because of specific features of dry powder inhalers and the required optimal inspiratory flow, an unmet need exists to identify individuals who are likely or unlikely to benefit from dry powder medications. Peak inspiratory flow, defined as the maximum airflow generated during inhalation against the simulated resistance of a dry powder inhaler, is a physiologic measure that has biological plausibility, has good test characteristics (repeatability and reliability), and is generalizable. Current evidence supports peak inspiratory flow as a predictive therapeutic biomarker to optimize therapy in both outpatients with COPD as well as those hospitalized for an exacerbation before discharge. This approach is consistent with the precepts of precision medicine, which considers differences in a person's biological features, exposure, and lifestyle to prevent and treat disease.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of Critical Errors and Insufficient Peak Inspiratory Flow in Patients Hospitalized with COPD in a Department of General Internal Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Grandmaison G, Grobety T, Vaucher J, Hayoz D, Suter P Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024; 11(4):406-415.

PMID: 38901836 PMC: 11363973. DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0505.


Clinical Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow.

Ohar J, Mahler D, Davis G, Lombardi D, Moran E, Crater G Can Respir J. 2024; 2024:8034923.

PMID: 38560416 PMC: 10980549. DOI: 10.1155/2024/8034923.


Stepwise management of COPD: What is next after bronchodilation?.

Miravitlles M, Matsunaga K, Dreher M Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2023; 17:17534666231208630.

PMID: 37936381 PMC: 10631322. DOI: 10.1177/17534666231208630.


Personalizing Selection of Inhaled Delivery Systems in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Mahler D, Halpin D Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023; 20(10):1389-1396.

PMID: 37499210 PMC: 10559134. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202304-384CME.


Standardized inhalation capability assessment: A key to optimal inhaler selection for inhalation therapy.

Wu Y, Zhang J J Transl Int Med. 2023; 11(1):26-29.

PMID: 37223614 PMC: 10202017. DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2022-0073.