» Articles » PMID: 33809695

Nasal Morphology and Its Correlation to Craniofacial Morphology in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33809695
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nose shape, size, and inclination influence facial appearance, but few studies concern the relationship between the nasal profile and craniofacial structures. The objective of this study was to analyze association of nasal cephalometric variables with skeletal structures, age, and sex. Cephalometric and nasal analysis was performed in 386 Polish orthodontic patients (aged 9-25 years). Student -test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare quantitative variables and Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients-to find correlations. Soft tissue facial convexity angle correlates to Holdaway ratio, ANB (A-Nasion-B), and Wits appraisal. Nasal dorsum axis, nose length, nose depth (1) and nose depth (2), nose hump, lower dorsum convexity, and columella convexity increase with age. Nasal base angle, nasolabial angle, nasomental angle, soft tissue facial convexity and nasal bone angle decrease with age. Nasal base angle and nasomental angle are smaller in females. Thus, a relationship exists between nasal morphology and sagittal jaw configuration. Nasal parameters significantly change with age. Sexual dimorphism characterizes nasal bone angle and nasomental angle.

Citing Articles

Genome wide association study reveals novel associations with face morphology.

Alshehhi A, Mousa M, Tay G, Werghi N, AlSafar H PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0299660.

PMID: 39928610 PMC: 11809905. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299660.


A cross-sectional study to correlate nasal profile and chin position with cephalometric lip profile.

Siddiqui T, Sukhia R, Irfan S, Hasan A, Fida M J Orthod Sci. 2025; 13:39.

PMID: 39758102 PMC: 11698244. DOI: 10.4103/jos.jos_28_24.


Craniofacial Measurements and Indices Trends in Latvian Children Aged 1-15.

Grabcika A, Kazoka D, Vetra J, Pilmane M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39334673 PMC: 11429820. DOI: 10.3390/children11091141.


Comparison of Diagnostic Validity of Cephalometric Analyses of the ANB Angle and Tau Angle for Assessment of the Sagittal Relationship of Jaw and Mandible.

Kotula J, Kuc A, Szelag E, Babczynska A, Lis J, Matys J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37834977 PMC: 10573306. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196333.


Investigation of the Relationship of Impacted Maxillary Canines with Orthodontic Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study.

Cicek O, Gurel T, Demir Cicek B Children (Basel). 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37371182 PMC: 10296910. DOI: 10.3390/children10060950.


References
1.
POSEN J . A longitudinal study of the growth of the nose. Am J Orthod. 1967; 53(10):746-56. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90119-4. View

2.
Hwang H, Kim W, McNamara Jr J . Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72(1):72-80. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0072:EDITST>2.0.CO;2. View

3.
Aljabaa A . Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019; 11:9-17. PMC: 6338237. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190230. View

4.
Lo F, HUNTER W . Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82(5):384-91. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90187-7. View

5.
Paradowska-Stolarz A, Kawala B . The Nasolabial Angle Among Patients with Total Cleft Lip and Palate. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(3):481-5. DOI: 10.17219/acem/28112. View