» Articles » PMID: 33807897

Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing-Conflict of Objectives Between Animal Welfare and Environment?

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33807897
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A partially (50%) perforated flooring system showed positive effects on health- and behavior-based welfare indicators without affecting production performance. Ammonia (NH) is the most common air pollutant in poultry production, with effects on animal welfare and the environment. The objectives of animal welfare and environmental protection are often incompatible. Therefore, this study addresses the question of how a partially perforated flooring system affects NH emissions. According to German regulations, three fattening periods were carried out with 500 Ross 308 broilers per barn (final stocking density: 39 kg m). The experimental barn was equipped with an elevated perforated area in the supply section, accessible by perforated ramps. The remaining area in the experimental barn and the control barn were equipped with wood shavings (600 g m). Besides the different floor types, management was identical. Air temperature (Temp), relative air humidity (RH), NH concentration, and ventilation rate (VR) were measured continuously. Furthermore, dry matter (DM) content, pH, and litter quality were assessed. Towards the end of the fattening periods, the NH emission rate (ER) of the partially perforated flooring system was higher compared with that of the littered control barn (all < 0.001). This effect is mainly caused by the higher NH concentrations, which are promoted by the lack of compaction underneath the elevated perforated area and the increase in pH value under aerobic conditions. Nevertheless, the partially perforated flooring system offers different approaches for NH reduction that were previously not feasible, potentially contributing equally to animal welfare and environmental protection.

Citing Articles

Welfare of broilers on farm.

Nielsen S, Alvarez J, Bicout D, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe J EFSA J. 2023; 21(2):e07788.

PMID: 36824680 PMC: 9941850. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7788.


Structuring Broiler Barns: How a Perforated Flooring System Affects Animal Behavior.

May F, Stracke J, Heitmann S, Adler C, Krasny A, Kemper N Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35327132 PMC: 8944615. DOI: 10.3390/ani12060735.


Design and Implementation of Poultry Farming Information Management System Based on Cloud Database.

Zheng H, Zhang T, Fang C, Zeng J, Yang X Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(3).

PMID: 33809835 PMC: 8004239. DOI: 10.3390/ani11030900.

References
1.
Schmithausen A, Trimborn M, Buscher W . Methodological Comparison between a Novel Automatic Sampling System for Gas Chromatography versus Photoacoustic Spectroscopy for Measuring Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Field Conditions. Sensors (Basel). 2016; 16(10). PMC: 5087426. DOI: 10.3390/s16101638. View

2.
Li H, Xin H, Burns R, Roberts S, Li S, Kliebenstein J . Reducing ammonia emissions from laying-hen houses through dietary manipulation. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2012; 62(2):160-9. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2011.638414. View

3.
Furtula V, Farrell E, Diarrassouba F, Rempel H, Pritchard J, Diarra M . Veterinary pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in poultry litter from commercial farms and controlled feeding trials. Poult Sci. 2009; 89(1):180-8. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00198. View

4.
Miles D, Brooks J, McLaughlin M, Rowe D . Broiler litter ammonia emissions near sidewalls, feeders, and waterers. Poult Sci. 2013; 92(7):1693-8. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02809. View

5.
Xin H, Gates R, Green A, Mitloehner F, Moore Jr P, Wathes C . Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems. Poult Sci. 2010; 90(1):263-77. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00877. View