» Articles » PMID: 33805600

Defining the Role of Attention in Hierarchical Auditory Processing

Overview
Journal Audiol Res
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33805600
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Communication in noise is a complex process requiring efficient neural encoding throughout the entire auditory pathway as well as contributions from higher-order cognitive processes (i.e., attention) to extract speech cues for perception. Thus, identifying effective clinical interventions for individuals with speech-in-noise deficits relies on the disentanglement of bottom-up (sensory) and top-down (cognitive) factors to appropriately determine the area of deficit; yet, how attention may interact with early encoding of sensory inputs remains unclear. For decades, attentional theorists have attempted to address this question with cleverly designed behavioral studies, but the neural processes and interactions underlying attention's role in speech perception remain unresolved. While anatomical and electrophysiological studies have investigated the neurological structures contributing to attentional processes and revealed relevant brain-behavior relationships, recent electrophysiological techniques (i.e., simultaneous recording of brainstem and cortical responses) may provide novel insight regarding the relationship between early sensory processing and top-down attentional influences. In this article, we review relevant theories that guide our present understanding of attentional processes, discuss current electrophysiological evidence of attentional involvement in auditory processing across subcortical and cortical levels, and propose areas for future study that will inform the development of more targeted and effective clinical interventions for individuals with speech-in-noise deficits.

Citing Articles

A Review of Auditory Attention: Neural Mechanisms, Theories, and Affective Disorders.

Razzaghipour A, Ashrafi M, Mohammadzadeh A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(3):2250-2256.

PMID: 38883545 PMC: 11169100. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04373-1.


Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood.

Ayala S, Eads A, Kabakoff H, Swartz M, Shiller D, Hill J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(4):1252-1273.

PMID: 36930986 PMC: 10187971. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00496.


Brainstem speech encoding is dynamically shaped online by fluctuations in cortical α state.

Lai J, Price C, Bidelman G Neuroimage. 2022; 263:119627.

PMID: 36122686 PMC: 10017375. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119627.


Event-Related Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interface Using the Thai Vowels' and Numerals' Auditory Stimulus Pattern.

Borirakarawin M, Punsawad Y Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(15).

PMID: 35957419 PMC: 9371073. DOI: 10.3390/s22155864.


Intracorporeal Cortical Telemetry as a Step to Automatic Closed-Loop EEG-Based CI Fitting: A Proof of Concept.

Beynon A, Luijten B, Mylanus E Audiol Res. 2021; 11(4):691-705.

PMID: 34940020 PMC: 8698912. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres11040062.

References
1.
Polley D, Thompson J, Guo W . Brief hearing loss disrupts binaural integration during two early critical periods of auditory cortex development. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2547. PMC: 4131765. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3547. View

2.
Bidelman G, Powers L . Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits. Int J Audiol. 2018; 57(9):665-672. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1470338. View

3.
Zion Golumbic E, Ding N, Bickel S, Lakatos P, Schevon C, McKhann G . Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party". Neuron. 2013; 77(5):980-91. PMC: 3891478. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037. View

4.
Pichora-Fuller M, Kramer S, Eckert M, Edwards B, Hornsby B, Humes L . Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear Hear. 2016; 37 Suppl 1:5S-27S. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312. View

5.
Laberge D, Tweedy J . PRESENTATION PROBABILITY AND CHOICE TIME. J Exp Psychol. 1964; 68:477-81. DOI: 10.1037/h0048691. View