» Articles » PMID: 33804831

Automated Spleen Injury Detection Using 3D Active Contours and Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Entropy (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33804831
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spleen is one of the most frequently injured organs in blunt abdominal trauma. Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice to assess patients with blunt spleen trauma, which may include lacerations, subcapsular or parenchymal hematomas, active hemorrhage, and vascular injuries. While computer-assisted diagnosis systems exist for other conditions assessed using CT scans, the current method to detect spleen injuries involves the manual review of scans by radiologists, which is a time-consuming and repetitive process. In this study, we propose an automated spleen injury detection method using machine learning. CT scans from patients experiencing traumatic injuries were collected from Michigan Medicine and the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network (CIREN) dataset. Ninety-nine scans of healthy and lacerated spleens were split into disjoint training and test sets, with random forest (RF), naive Bayes, SVM, -nearest neighbors (-NN) ensemble, and subspace discriminant ensemble models trained via 5-fold cross validation. Of these models, random forest performed the best, achieving an Area Under the receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.91 and an F1 score of 0.80 on the test set. These results suggest that an automated, quantitative assessment of traumatic spleen injury has the potential to enable faster triage and improve patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

The RSNA Abdominal Traumatic Injury CT (RATIC) Dataset.

Rudie J, Lin H, Ball R, Jalal S, Prevedello L, Nicolaou S Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(6):e240101.

PMID: 39441109 PMC: 11605137. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.240101.


Artificial Intelligence-What to Expect From Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Hernia Surgery.

Vogel R, Muck B J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024; 3:13059.

PMID: 39310669 PMC: 11412881. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13059.


Toward automated interpretable AAST grading for blunt splenic injury.

Chen H, Unberath M, Dreizin D Emerg Radiol. 2022; 30(1):41-50.

PMID: 36371579 PMC: 10314366. DOI: 10.1007/s10140-022-02099-1.


Importance of the neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with spleen trauma: A single center experience.

Vunvulea V, Suciu B, Cocuz I, Bacalbasa N, Molnar C, Ghiga D Biomed Rep. 2022; 17(4):80.

PMID: 36158317 PMC: 9468845. DOI: 10.3892/br.2022.1563.


Entropy in Image Analysis III.

Sparavigna A Entropy (Basel). 2021; 23(12).

PMID: 34945954 PMC: 8700749. DOI: 10.3390/e23121648.

References
1.
Doi K . Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007; 31(4-5):198-211. PMC: 1955762. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.002. View

2.
Marentakis P, Karaiskos P, Kouloulias V, Kelekis N, Argentos S, Oikonomopoulos N . Lung cancer histology classification from CT images based on radiomics and deep learning models. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021; 59(1):215-226. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02302-w. View

3.
Lebedev A, Westman E, van Westen G, Kramberger M, Lundervold A, Aarsland D . Random Forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer's disease with a good between-cohort robustness. Neuroimage Clin. 2014; 6:115-25. PMC: 4215532. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.023. View

4.
Dhara A, Mukhopadhyay S, Dutta A, Garg M, Khandelwal N . A Combination of Shape and Texture Features for Classification of Pulmonary Nodules in Lung CT Images. J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29(4):466-75. PMC: 4942385. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9857-6. View

5.
Lee J, Jun S, Cho Y, Lee H, Kim G, Seo J . Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview. Korean J Radiol. 2017; 18(4):570-584. PMC: 5447633. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570. View