Adjusted Indirect and Mixed Comparisons of Interventions for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) of Disabled Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal Int J Environ Res Public Health

Publisher MDPI

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2021 Apr 3

PMID 33804553

Citations 1

Authors

Yining Xu

Xin Li

Zhihong Sun

Yang Song

Julien S Baker

Yaodong Gu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This systematic review adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA) guidelines and used the method of network meta-analysis to compare the effects of different types of interventions from different perspectives which were abilities of daily life activity, psychological health, social functioning, and overall life quality. The eligibility criteria were: (1) Participants were adults above 18 years old with disabilities; (2) Interventions could be classified into active exercise, passive therapy, psychological education, psychosocial support program, multi-disciplinary program, and usual care; (3) Outcomes should be the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that could be classified into abilities of daily life activity, psychological health, social functioning, and overall life quality; (4) Randomized designed and published in English. The keywords and their search field were: (1) "people with disabilities/disability", "disabled", "handicapped", or "disable people" in titles or abstracts; (2) AND "randomized" or "randomised" in titles or abstracts; (3) NOT "design", "protocol", or "review" in titles. After searching in databases of Medline (EBSCO), PubMed, CINAHL, and Ovid, 16 studies were included. As a result, active exercise and passive therapy are most likely to be the best interventions for overall life quality, psychological education and passive therapy are most likely to be the best interventions for abilities of daily life activity, and psychosocial support programs are most likely to be the best intervention for psychological health and social functioning.

Citing Articles

Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Poland Based on National Data-Challenge for Healthcare in Aging Society.

Gajda M, Pac A, Gryglewska B, Gajda P, Rozanska A, Wojkowska-Mach J Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(8).

PMID: 34442061 PMC: 8391115. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9080924.

References

Metzelthin S, van Rossum E, Hendriks M, de Witte L, Hobma S, Sipers W . Reducing disability in community-dwelling frail older people: cost-effectiveness study alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2015; 44(3):390-6. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu200. View

Sancassiani F, Cocco A, Cossu G, Lorrai S, Trincas G, Floris F . "VelaMente?!" - Sailin in a Crew to Improve Self-Efficacy in People with Psychosocial Disabilities: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017; 13:200-212. PMC: 5712647. DOI: 10.2174/1745017901713010200. View

Allen K, Blascovich J . The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996; 275(13):1001-6. View

Lungu D, Pennucci F, De Rosis S, Romano G, Melfi F . Implementing successful systematic Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs) in robotic oncological surgery-The role of physicians. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019; 35(3):773-787. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2959. View

Dias S, Welton N, Caldwell D, Ades A . Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010; 29(7-8):932-44. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3767. View

Stratford P, Binkley J, Riddle D . Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(16):2095-102. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00015. View

Chung K, Pillsbury M, Walters M, Hayward R . Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23(4):575-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7. View

Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A . Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain. 1994; 57(3):317-326. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90007-8. View

Chapman J, Norvell D, Hermsmeyer J, Bransford R, DeVine J, McGirt M . Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21 Suppl):S54-68. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d. View

10.

Leclerc G, Lefrancois R, Dube M, Hebert R, Gaulin P . Criterion validity of a new measure of self-actualization. Psychol Rep. 2000; 85(3 Pt 2):1167-76. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1167. View

11.

Richards S, Nepomuceno C, Riles M, Suer Z . Assessing pain behavior: the UAB Pain Behavior Scale. Pain. 1982; 14(4):393-398. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90147-6. View

12.

Spanjer J, Groothoff J, Brouwer S . Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(23-24):2143-50. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.570413. View

13.

Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

14.

Edgren J, Rantanen T, Heinonen A, Portegijs E, Alen M, Kiviranta I . Effects of progressive resistance training on physical disability among older community-dwelling people with history of hip fracture. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012; 24(2):171-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF03325162. View

15.

Singh N, Hwang Y . Mindfulness-based programs and practices for people with intellectual and developmental disability. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019; 33(2):86-91. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000570. View

16.

Petrozzi M, Leaver A, Jones M, Ferreira P, Rubinstein S, Mackey M . Does an online psychological intervention improve self-efficacy and disability in people also receiving Multimodal Manual Therapy for chronic low back pain compared to Multimodal Manual Therapy alone? Design of a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2015; 23:35. PMC: 4683746. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-015-0080-9. View

17.

Chu K, Bu X, Sun Z, Wang Y, Feng W, Xiao L . Feasibility of a Nurse-Trained, Family Member-Delivered Rehabilitation Model for Disabled Stroke Patients in Rural Chongqing, China. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020; 29(12):105382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105382. View

18.

Melzack R . The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975; 1(3):277-299. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5. View

19.

Mills E, Thorlund K, Ioannidis J . Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013; 346:f2914. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2914. View

20.

Efthimiou O, Mavridis D, Cipriani A, Leucht S, Bagos P, Salanti G . An approach for modelling multiple correlated outcomes in a network of interventions using odds ratios. Stat Med. 2014; 33(13):2275-87. DOI: 10.1002/sim.6117. View