» Articles » PMID: 33803431

Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations About Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33803431
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: despite the efforts of multiple stakeholders to promote appropriate care throughout the healthcare system, studies show that two out of three lower back pain (LBP) patients expect to receive imaging. We used the Choosing Wisely Canada patient-oriented framework, prioritizing patient engagement, to develop an intervention that addresses lower back pain imaging overuse.

Methods: to develop this intervention, we collaborated with a multidisciplinary advisory team, including two patient partners with lower back pain, researchers, clinicians, healthcare administrators, and the Choosing Wisely Canada lead for Saskatchewan. For this qualitative study, data were collected through two advisory team meetings, two individual interviews with lower back pain patient partners, and three focus groups with lower back pain patient participants. A lower back pain prescription pad was developed as an outcome of these consultations.

Results: participants reported a lack of interactive and informative communication was a significant barrier to receiving appropriate care. The most cited content information for inclusion in this intervention was treatments known to work, including physical activity, useful equipment, and reliable sources of educational material. Participants also suggested it was important that benefits and risks of imaging were explained on the pad. Three key themes derived from the data were also used to guide development of the intervention: (a) the role of imaging in LBP diagnosis; (b) the impact of the patient-physician relationship on LBP diagnosis and treatment; and (c) the lack of patient awareness of Choosing Wisely Canada and their recommendations.

Conclusions: the lower back pain patient-developed prescription pad may help patients and clinicians engage in informed conversations and shared decision making that could support reduce unnecessary lower back pain imaging.

Citing Articles

Improving appropriate imaging for non-specific low back pain.

Al-Hihi E, Gibson C, Lee J, Mount R, Irani N, McGowan C BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35190485 PMC: 8862455. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001539.


Empowering Patients and Supporting Health Care Providers-New Avenues for High Quality Care and Safety.

Busch I, Rimondini M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18).

PMID: 34574364 PMC: 8472216. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189438.

References
1.
Kessels R . Patients' memory for medical information. J R Soc Med. 2003; 96(5):219-22. PMC: 539473. DOI: 10.1177/014107680309600504. View

2.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim K, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(22):2071-7. PMC: 6276814. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440. View

3.
Chou R, Deyo R, Jarvik J . Appropriate use of lumbar imaging for evaluation of low back pain. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012; 50(4):569-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.005. View

4.
Slade S, Kent P, Bucknall T, Molloy E, Patel S, Buchbinder R . Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4):e007265. PMC: 4410131. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007265. View

5.
Johnson A, Sandford J . Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home: systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2004; 20(4):423-9. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyg141. View