» Articles » PMID: 33800995

Job Quality and Work-Life Balance of Teleworkers

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33800995
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As telework and mobile work arrangements become more widespread with new advancements in digitalization, these flexible models of work are rapidly expanding to new categories of employees and completely modifying working conditions and job quality. The aim of this study was to assess how particular types of telework affect different dimensions of job quality. We applied multivariable techniques to a sample of 35,765 workers from the Sixth European Working Conditions Survey. Our findings show that gender and types of telework by workplace and ICT-use intensity are crucial factors affecting working conditions and job quality. Occasional teleworkers are the group with the best job quality, while highly mobile teleworkers are those with the worst job quality and work-life balance. Home-based teleworkers, especially women, present better results than highly mobile workers in terms of working time quality and intensity, though in exchange for lower skills and discretion, income, and career prospects. This study contributes to deepening our knowledge on the impacts of flexible arrangements of work, providing an analysis of current data on different dimensions of job quality and work-life balance and including gender as a crucial axis of analysis.

Citing Articles

High Body Roundness Index Is Associated With Unhealthy Sleep Patterns: Insights From NHANES (2007-2014).

Liu P, Luo Y, He X, Zhang J, Ren F, Zhang B Brain Behav. 2024; 15(1):e70224.

PMID: 39740783 PMC: 11688115. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70224.


Remote working and experiential wellbeing: A latent lifestyle perspective using UK time use survey before and during COVID-19.

Chen J, Wan L PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305096.

PMID: 39052629 PMC: 11288641. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305096.


Comparing Exposure to Psychosocial Risks: Face-to-Face Work vs. Telework.

Gomez-Dominguez A, Ferrer-Rosende P, Esteve-Matali L, Llorens-Serrano C, Salas-Nicas S, Navarro-Gine A Med Lav. 2024; 115(3):e2024020.

PMID: 38922841 PMC: 11223562. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v115i3.15265.


Organizational and occupational health issues with working remotely during the pandemic: a scoping review of remote work and health.

Lyzwinski L J Occup Health. 2024; 66(1).

PMID: 38289710 PMC: 11069417. DOI: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae005.


Part-time or full-time teleworking? A systematic review of the psychosocial risk factors of telework from home.

Antunes E, Bridi L, Santos M, Fischer F Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1065593.

PMID: 36910835 PMC: 9992198. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065593.


References
1.
Golden T, Veiga J, Simsek Z . Telecommuting's differential impact on work-family conflict: is there no place like home?. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(6):1340-50. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340. View

2.
Chung H, van der Horst M . Women's employment patterns after childbirth and the perceived access to and use of flexitime and teleworking. Hum Relat. 2017; 71(1):47-72. PMC: 5714156. DOI: 10.1177/0018726717713828. View

3.
Chung H, van der Lippe T . Flexible Working, Work-Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Soc Indic Res. 2020; 151(2):365-381. PMC: 7505827. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x. View