» Articles » PMID: 33800790

A Cost-Effective Inertial Measurement System for Tracking Movement and Triggering Kinesthetic Feedback in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33800790
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Advances in lower-limb prosthetic technologies have facilitated the restoration of ambulation; however, users of such technologies still experience reduced balance control, also due to the absence of proprioceptive feedback. Recent efforts have demonstrated the ability to restore kinesthetic feedback in upper-limb prosthesis applications; however, technical solutions to trigger the required muscle vibration and provide automated feedback have not been explored for lower-limb prostheses. The study's first objective was therefore to develop a feedback system capable of tracking lower-limb movement and automatically triggering a muscle vibrator to induce the kinesthetic illusion. The second objective was to investigate the developed system's ability to provide kinesthetic feedback in a case participant. A low-cost, wireless feedback system, incorporating two inertial measurement units to trigger a muscle vibrator, was developed and tested in an individual with limb loss above the knee. Our system had a maximum communication delay of 50 ms and showed good tracking of Gaussian and sinusoidal movement profiles for velocities below 180 degrees per second (error < 8 degrees), mimicking stepping and walking, respectively. We demonstrated in the case participant that the developed feedback system can successfully elicit the kinesthetic illusion. Our work contributes to the integration of sensory feedback in lower-limb prostheses, to increase their use and functionality.

Citing Articles

Gait Alteration in Individual with Limb Loss: The Role of Inertial Sensors.

Demeco A, Frizziero A, Nuresi C, Buccino G, Pisani F, Martini C Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4).

PMID: 36850475 PMC: 9964846. DOI: 10.3390/s23041880.

References
1.
Seel T, Raisch J, Schauer T . IMU-based joint angle measurement for gait analysis. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14(4):6891-909. PMC: 4029684. DOI: 10.3390/s140406891. View

2.
El-Gohary M, McNames J . Human Joint Angle Estimation with Inertial Sensors and Validation with A Robot Arm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015; 62(7):1759-67. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2403368. View

3.
Goodwin G, McCloskey D, Matthews P . The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain. 1972; 95(4):705-48. DOI: 10.1093/brain/95.4.705. View

4.
Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D . ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. J Biomech. 2002; 35(4):543-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00222-6. View

5.
Bae T, Choi K, Hong D, Mun M . Dynamic analysis of above-knee amputee gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007; 22(5):557-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.12.009. View