» Articles » PMID: 33799544

Affordability of Adult Tuberculosis Vaccination in India and China: A Dynamic Transmission Model-Based Analysis

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33799544
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New tuberculosis vaccines have made substantial progress in the development pipeline. Previous modelling suggests that adolescent/adult mass vaccination may cost-effectively contribute towards achieving global tuberculosis control goals. These analyses have not considered the budgetary feasibility of vaccine programmes. We estimate the maximum total cost that the public health sectors in India and China should expect to pay to introduce a M72/AS01-like vaccine deemed cost-effective at country-specific willingness to pay thresholds for cost-effectiveness. To estimate the total disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted by the vaccination programme, we simulated a 50% efficacy vaccine providing 10-years of protection in post-infection populations between 2027 and 2050 in India and China using a dynamic transmission model of . We investigated two mass vaccination strategies, both delivered every 10-years achieving 70% coverage: Vaccinating adults and adolescents (age ≥10y), or only the most efficient 10-year age subgroup (defined as greatest DALYs averted per vaccine given). We used country-specific thresholds for cost-effectiveness to estimate the maximum total cost (C) a government should be willing to pay for each vaccination strategy. Adult/adolescent vaccination resulted in a C of $21 billion (uncertainty interval [UI]: 16-27) in India, and $15B (UI:12-29) in China at willingness to pay thresholds of $264/DALY averted and $3650/DALY averted, respectively. Vaccinating the highest efficiency age group (India: 50-59y; China: 60-69y) resulted in a C of $5B (UI:4-6) in India and $6B (UI:4-7) in China. Mass vaccination against tuberculosis of all adults and adolescents, deemed cost-effective, will likely impose a substantial budgetary burden. Targeted tuberculosis vaccination, deemed cost-effective, may represent a more affordable approach.

Citing Articles

Adult vaccination in India: A rapid review of current status & implementation challenges.

Bhattacharyya A, Shahabuddin S Indian J Med Res. 2024; 160(3&4):279-292.

PMID: 39632644 PMC: 11619099. DOI: 10.25259/IJMR_1521_2024.


Mapping the existing body of knowledge on new and repurposed TB vaccine implementation: A scoping review.

Buis J, Jerene D, Gebhard A, Bakker R, Majidulla A, Kerkhoff A PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(8):e0002885.

PMID: 39172796 PMC: 11340902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002885.


Updating age-specific contact structures to match evolving demography in a dynamic mathematical model of tuberculosis vaccination.

Weerasuriya C, Harris R, McQuaid C, Gomez G, White R PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(4):e1010002.

PMID: 35452459 PMC: 9067655. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010002.


It Takes a Village: The Multifaceted Immune Response to Infection and Vaccine-Induced Immunity.

Larsen S, Williams B, Rais M, Coler R, Baldwin S Front Immunol. 2022; 13:840225.

PMID: 35359957 PMC: 8960931. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.840225.


Accelerating research and development of new vaccines against tuberculosis: a global roadmap.

Cobelens F, Suri R, Helinski M, Makanga M, Weinberg A, Schaffmeister B Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22(4):e108-e120.

PMID: 35240041 PMC: 8884775. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00810-0.


References
1.
Ochalek J, Lomas J, Claxton K . Estimating health opportunity costs in low-income and middle-income countries: a novel approach and evidence from cross-country data. BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(6):e000964. PMC: 6231096. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000964. View

2.
Harris R, Sumner T, Knight G, Zhang H, White R . Potential impact of tuberculosis vaccines in China, South Africa, and India. Sci Transl Med. 2020; 12(564). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax4607. View

3.
Bilinski A, Neumann P, Cohen J, Thorat T, McDaniel K, Salomon J . When cost-effective interventions are unaffordable: Integrating cost-effectiveness and budget impact in priority setting for global health programs. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(10):e1002397. PMC: 5624570. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002397. View

4.
Langley I, Lin H, Squire S . Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF and investing in health care in Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3(2):e83-4. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70370-5. View

5.
Tait D, Hatherill M, Van Der Meeren O, Ginsberg A, van Brakel E, Salaun B . Final Analysis of a Trial of M72/AS01 Vaccine to Prevent Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(25):2429-2439. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909953. View