» Articles » PMID: 33799383

Redefinition of Park Design Criteria As a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33799383
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Well-being and soundscape analysis should be useful in re-design works involved in the planning of recreational areas and green spaces on campuses to improve the health of students, academics, and university staff. Proper space planning, for example, in campus parks, including the planning of soundscape zones, is important in relieving study and work stress. The aim of the study was to conduct a multicriteria analysis of the soundscape and well-being of users in the university park on campus in Olsztyn (Poland). It was important to redefine thinking about the re-composition of park space, including reduction of noise and improving well-being. The research included: 1. measurements of sound pressure levels (SPL) at selected points in two periods, 2. interview with park users and preparation of a mental map, 3. experts' opinion on soundscape and well-being, and 4. design schemes for re-design of the park. The results of research regarding the perception of the soundscape and well-being in Kortowo park by respondents differ slightly from the results of SPL measurements. The results also confirm the difference between SPL in the leafless and leafy period. The results show a clear relationship between the perception of sounds and well-being in the park. However, in some areas near the water, where higher noise levels are reported the respondents felt quite comfortable. Finally, design schemes are proposed, based on experts' opinions and results of the analysis.

Citing Articles

Healthcare Professionals and Noise-Generating Tools: Challenging Assumptions about Hearing Loss Risk.

Alberti G, Portelli D, Galletti C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(15).

PMID: 37569060 PMC: 10418966. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20156520.

References
1.
Veitch J, Denniss E, Ball K, Koorts H, Deforche B, Timperio A . Increasing translation of research evidence for optimal park design: a qualitative study with stakeholders. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020; 17(1):49. PMC: 7160899. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00952-5. View

2.
Hamilton K, Kaczynski A, Fair M, Levesque L . Examining the Relationship between Park Neighborhoods, Features, Cleanliness, and Condition with Observed Weekday Park Usage and Physical Activity: A Case Study. J Environ Public Health. 2018; 2017:7582402. PMC: 5733243. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7582402. View

3.
Tashakor S, Chamani A . Temporal variability of noise pollution attenuation by vegetation in urban parks. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 28(18):23143-23151. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12355-5. View

4.
Lam K, Ng S, Hui W, Chan P . Environmental quality of urban parks and open spaces in Hong Kong. Environ Monit Assess. 2005; 111(1-3):55-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-8039-2. View

5.
Aletta F, Oberman T, Kang J . Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(11). PMC: 6266166. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15112392. View