» Articles » PMID: 33798711

Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Apr 2
PMID 33798711
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize emerging data on the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods: Through a systematic search of multiple electronic databases through November 9, 2020, we identified cohort studies or case series (>10 patients) reporting the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous use of biologic agents in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with IBD. Rates of adverse events, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission were synthesized using pooled data, and we identified factors associated with successful dual therapy.

Results: We identified 30 studies reporting 288 trials of dual biologic or small molecule therapy in 279 patients (76% Crohn's disease; median duration of treatment 24 weeks (IQR-IQR 1332)). The main indications for dual therapy included medically refractory IBD (81%) and concurrent extra-intestinal manifestations or rheumatologic disease (12%). The most common combinations of dual therapy included tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists & anti-integrins (48%), ustekinumab & anti-integrins (19%); 61% of patients had previously failed at least one of the two therapies used in combination. Over a median follow-up of 32 weeks (IQR-IQR 24-52), pooled rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 31% (95% CI, 13%-54%) and 6.5% (95% CI, 2.1%-13.1%); pooled rates of clinical and endoscopic remission were 59% (95% CI, 42%-74%), and 34% (95% CI, 23%-46%), respectively. 12% (95% CI, 4%-24%) of patients required surgery. Rates of success were higher in patients on dual therapy due to EIM. Heterogeneity was not significant for endoscopic response (P = .88, I = 0%), endoscopic remission (P = .44, I = 0%), and malignancy (P = .87, I = 0%). However, significant heterogeneity existed for other outcomes.

Conclusions: Dual biologic or small molecule therapy may be a possible option in highly selected, refractory IBD patients at specialized centers. Higher quality combination of therapies with a significant improvement in the quality of data is required prior to more widespread use.

Citing Articles

Comparative Effectiveness of Dual Biologic Therapy and Biologic Small-Molecule Therapy for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Yin F, Liu X, He D, Li S, Feng X, Shi Y Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 18(3):e70198.

PMID: 40065597 PMC: 11893725. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70198.


Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.

Yan J, Nie M, Zhang H, Liu Y, Tang F World J Gastroenterol. 2025; 31(9):100607.

PMID: 40061596 PMC: 11886040. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i9.100607.


Advanced Combination Therapy with Biologics and Upadacitinib in Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.

Meng M, Kuo C, Lai M, Chiu C, Su M, Chang M J Inflamm Res. 2025; 18:2733-2742.

PMID: 40026313 PMC: 11872097. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S511309.


Dual Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Altieri G, Zilli A, Parigi T, Allocca M, Furfaro F, Fiorino G Biomolecules. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001525 PMC: 11853240. DOI: 10.3390/biom15020222.


Risk factors and clinical characteristics of colonization and infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease exposed to Vedolizumab: a multicenter retrospective study.

Li Q, Song X, Su P, Lv X, Liu X, Chen X Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025; 18:17562848251321707.

PMID: 39975482 PMC: 11837063. DOI: 10.1177/17562848251321707.