» Articles » PMID: 33794101

Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data of Polish Patients from Real-Life Conditions: More Scanning and Better Glycemic Control Compared to Worldwide Data

Overview
Date 2021 Apr 1
PMID 33794101
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Randomized trials and observational studies have shown that the use of FreeStyle Libre intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring system (isCGMS) is associated with improved glycemic indices and quality of life. In this retrospective, real-world data analysis, we described country-specific glucometrics among isCGMS users from Poland and compared them with international data. The analyzed time period for the Polish data ranged between August 2016 and August 2020, and the analyzed time period for the international data ranged from September 2014 to August 2020. Data from the Polish population were collected from 10,679 readers and 92,627 sensors with 113 million automatically recorded glucose readings. The worldwide database included information from 981,876 readers and 11,179,229 sensors with 13.1 billion glucose readings. On average, the users of isCGMS from Poland performed substantially more scans/day (21.2 ± 14.2 vs. 13.2 ± 10.7), achieved lower eHbA1c (7.0% ± 1.2% vs. 7.5% ± 1.5%), and spent more time-in-range (TIR) (64.2% ± 17.3% vs. 58.1% ± 20.3%) and less time-above-range (TAR) (29.7% ± 18.0% vs. 36.6% ± 21.3%) ( < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Moreover, they were more likely to achieve TIR >70% (36.3% vs. 28.8%), but spent more time-below-range (TBR) (4.7% vs. 3.6%). Our results confirmed that analyzed glucometrics improve as the scan rate frequency increases. However, at a similar scanning frequency to the comparative group, users from Poland achieved lower eHbA1c, higher TIR, and lower TAR, but higher TBR. We report more scanning and better glycemic control in isCGMS users in Poland than worldwide. The cause of this observation remains unknown. Our data also show that in real-life practice, a large number of patients may be willing to perform scanning more frequently than it is usually assumed.

Citing Articles

Impact of the initiation of isCGM soon after type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosis in adults on glycemic indices and fear of hypoglycemia: a randomized controlled trial.

Hohendorff J, Grzelka-Wozniak A, Wrobel M, Kania M, Lapinska L, Rokicka D Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15():1503891.

PMID: 39850477 PMC: 11754065. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1503891.


7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

Diabetes Care. 2024; 48(Supplement_1):S146-S166.

PMID: 39651978 PMC: 11635043. DOI: 10.2337/dc25-S007.


Predictors of the effectiveness of isCGM usage in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: post-hoc analysis of the ISCHIA study.

Murata T, Hirota Y, Hosoda K, Kato K, Kouyama K, Kouyama R Diabetol Int. 2024; 15(3):400-405.

PMID: 39101179 PMC: 11291818. DOI: 10.1007/s13340-023-00683-5.


Association of scan frequency with CGM-derived metrics and influential factors in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Sakane N, Hirota Y, Yamamoto A, Miura J, Takaike H, Hoshina S Diabetol Int. 2024; 15(1):109-116.

PMID: 38264231 PMC: 10800315. DOI: 10.1007/s13340-023-00655-9.


7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.

Diabetes Care. 2023; 47(Suppl 1):S126-S144.

PMID: 38078575 PMC: 10725813. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-S007.


References
1.
Nathan D, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine R . Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(8):1473-8. PMC: 2742903. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0545. View

2.
Kudva Y, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Gavin 3rd J, Kruger D, Midyett L . Approach to Using Trend Arrows in the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring Systems in Adults. J Endocr Soc. 2018; 2(12):1320-1337. PMC: 6243139. DOI: 10.1210/js.2018-00294. View

3.
Chobot A, Polanska J, Brandt A, Deja G, Glowinska-Olszewska B, Pilecki O . Updated 24-year trend of Type 1 diabetes incidence in children in Poland reveals a sinusoidal pattern and sustained increase. Diabet Med. 2017; 34(9):1252-1258. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13345. View

4.
Rutkowski M, Wojciechowska A, Smigielski W, Drygas W, Piwonska A, Pajak A . Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Poland in 2005-2014: results of the WOBASZ surveys. Diabet Med. 2020; 37(9):1528-1535. DOI: 10.1111/dme.14333. View

5.
Al Hayek A, Al Dawish M . The Potential Impact of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Mental Well-Being and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Study. Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(4):1239-1248. PMC: 6612356. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-0616-4. View