» Articles » PMID: 33793205

Bragg Coherent Diffraction Imaging for Studies in Electrocatalysis

Overview
Journal ACS Nano
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Apr 1
PMID 33793205
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electrocatalysis is at the heart of a broad range of physicochemical applications that play an important role in the present and future of a sustainable economy. Among the myriad of different electrocatalysts used in this field, nanomaterials are of ubiquitous importance. An increased surface area/volume ratio compared to bulk makes nanoscale catalysts the preferred choice to perform electrocatalytic reactions. Bragg coherent diffraction imaging (BCDI) was introduced in 2006 and since has been applied to obtain 3D images of crystalline nanomaterials. BCDI provides information about the displacement field, which is directly related to strain. Lattice strain in the catalysts impacts their electronic configuration and, consequently, their binding energy with reaction intermediates. Even though there have been significant improvements since its birth, the fact that the experiments can only be performed at synchrotron facilities and its relatively low resolution to date (∼10 nm spatial resolution) have prevented the popularization of this technique. Herein, we will briefly describe the fundamentals of the technique, including the electrocatalysis relevant information that we can extract from it. Subsequently, we review some of the computational experiments that complement the BCDI data for enhanced information extraction and improved understanding of the underlying nanoscale electrocatalytic processes. We next highlight success stories of BCDI applied to different electrochemical systems and in heterogeneous catalysis to show how the technique can contribute to future studies in electrocatalysis. Finally, we outline current challenges in spatiotemporal resolution limits of BCDI and provide our perspectives on recent developments in synchrotron facilities as well as the role of machine learning and artificial intelligence in addressing them.

Citing Articles

Unraveling the synergistic effects of Cu-Ag tandem catalysts during electrochemical CO reduction using nanofocused X-ray probes.

Frisch M, Wu L, Atlan C, Ren Z, Han M, Tucoulou R Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):7833.

PMID: 38030620 PMC: 10687089. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43693-2.


Defects and nanostrain gradients control phase transition mechanisms in single crystal high-voltage lithium spinel.

Martens I, Vostrov N, Mirolo M, Leake S, Zatterin E, Zhu X Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6975.

PMID: 37914690 PMC: 10620135. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42285-4.


: graphical user interface for Bragg coherent diffraction imaging.

Simonne D, Carnis J, Atlan C, Chatelier C, Favre-Nicolin V, Dupraz M J Appl Crystallogr. 2022; 55(Pt 4):1045-1054.

PMID: 35974722 PMC: 9348885. DOI: 10.1107/S1600576722005854.

References
1.
Yau A, Cha W, Kanan M, Stephenson G, Ulvestad A . Bragg coherent diffractive imaging of single-grain defect dynamics in polycrystalline films. Science. 2017; 356(6339):739-742. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam6168. View

2.
Gawande M, Goswami A, Asefa T, Guo H, Biradar A, Peng D . Core-shell nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Chem Soc Rev. 2015; 44(21):7540-90. DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00343a. View

3.
Bjorling A, Kalbfleisch S, Kahnt M, Sala S, Parfeniukas K, Vogt U . Ptychographic characterization of a coherent nanofocused X-ray beam. Opt Express. 2020; 28(4):5069-5076. DOI: 10.1364/OE.386068. View

4.
Howells M, Beetz T, Chapman H, Cui C, Holton J, Jacobsen C . An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2011; 170(1-3):4-12. PMC: 2867487. DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2008.10.008. View

5.
Suzana A, Rochet A, Passos A, Castro Zerba J, Polo C, Santilli C . three-dimensional imaging of strain in gold nanocrystals during catalytic oxidation. Nanoscale Adv. 2022; 1(8):3009-3014. PMC: 9417304. DOI: 10.1039/c9na00231f. View