» Articles » PMID: 33791568

Tiger Salamanders () Increase Foot Contact Surface Area on Challenging Substrates During Terrestrial Locomotion

Overview
Journal Integr Org Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Apr 1
PMID 33791568
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals live in heterogeneous environments must navigate in order to forage or capture food, defend territories, and locate mates. These heterogeneous environments have a variety of substrates that differ in their roughness, texture, and other properties, all of which may alter locomotor performance. Despite such natural variation in substrate, many studies on locomotion use noncompliant surfaces that either are unrepresentative of the range of substrates experienced by species or underestimate maximal locomotor capabilities. The goal of this study was to determine the role of forefeet and hindfeet on substrates with different properties during walking in a generalized sprawling tetrapod, the tiger salamander (). Adult salamanders ( = 4, SVL = 11.2-14.6 cm) walked across level dry sand (DS), semi-soft plaster of Paris (PoP), wet sand (WS), and a hard, noncompliant surface (table)-substrates that vary in compliance. Trials were filmed in dorsal and anterior views. Videos were analyzed to determine the number of digits and surface area of each foot in contact with the substrate. The surface area of the forelimbs contacting the substrate was significantly greater on DS and PoP than on WS and the table. The surface area of the hindlimbs contacting the substrate was significantly greater on DS than on all other substrates. There were no significant differences in the time that the fore- or hindfeet were in contact with the substrate as determined by the number of digits. We conclude that salamanders modulate the use of their feet depending on the substrate, particularly on DS which is known to increase the mechanical work and energy expended during locomotion owing to the fluid nature of its loose particles. More studies are needed to test a wider range of substrates and to incorporate behavioral data from field studies to get a better understanding of how salamanders are affected by different substrates in their natural environment.

Citing Articles

Maneuvering on non-Newtonian fluidic terrain: a survey of animal and bio-inspired robot locomotion techniques on soft yielding grounds.

Godon S, Kruusmaa M, Ristolainen A Front Robot AI. 2023; 10:1113881.

PMID: 37346053 PMC: 10279858. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1113881.


Body and Tail Coordination in the Bluespot Salamander () During Limb Regeneration.

Donatelli C, Lutek K, Gupta K, Standen E Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:629713.

PMID: 34124171 PMC: 8193843. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.629713.

References
1.
Shapiro L, Young J . Is primate-like quadrupedalism necessary for fine-branch locomotion? A test using sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps). J Hum Evol. 2010; 58(4):309-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.12.002. View

2.
Mansfield R, Jayne B . Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010; 197(1):119-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0593-6. View

3.
Qian F, Zhang T, Korff W, Umbanhowar P, Full R, Goldman D . Principles of appendage design in robots and animals determining terradynamic performance on flowable ground. Bioinspir Biomim. 2015; 10(5):056014. DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/5/056014. View

4.
McElroy E, Wilson R, Biknevicius A, Reilly S . A comparative study of single-leg ground reaction forces in running lizards. J Exp Biol. 2013; 217(Pt 5):735-42. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.095620. View

5.
Lejeune T, Willems P, Heglund N . Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand. J Exp Biol. 1998; 201(Pt 13):2071-80. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.201.13.2071. View