» Articles » PMID: 33788595

User Experience With Low-Cost Virtual Reality Cancer Surgery Simulation in an African Setting

Overview
Journal JCO Glob Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Mar 31
PMID 33788595
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Limited access to adequate cancer surgery training is one of the driving forces behind global inequities in surgical cancer care. Affordable virtual reality (VR) surgical training could enhance surgical skills in low- and middle-income settings, but most VR and augmented reality systems are too expensive and do not teach open surgical techniques commonly practiced in these contexts. New low-cost VR can offer skill development simulations relevant to these settings, but little is known about how knowledge is gained and applied by surgeons training and working in specific resource-constrained settings. This study addresses this gap, exploring gynecologic oncology trainee learning and user experience using a low-cost VR simulator to learn to perform an open radical abdominal hysterectomy in Lusaka, Zambia.

Methods: Eleven surgical trainees rotating through the gynecologic oncology service were sequentially recruited from the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka to participate in a study evaluating a VR radical abdominal hysterectomy training designed to replicate the experience in a Zambian hospital. Six participated in semi-structured interviews following the training. Interviews were analyzed using open and axial coding, informed by grounded theory.

Results: Simulator participation increased participants' perception of their surgical knowledge, confidence, and skills. Participants believed their skills transferred to other related surgical procedures. Having clear goals and motivation to improve were described as factors that influenced success.

Conclusion: For cancer surgery trainees in lower-resourced settings learning medical and surgical skills, even for those with limited VR experience, low-cost VR simulators may enhance anatomical knowledge and confidence. The VR simulator reinforced anatomical and clinical knowledge acquired through other modalities. VR-enhanced learning may be particularly valuable when mentored learning opportunities are limited.

Citing Articles

Assessing availability and trainees' perceptions of simulation and augmented reality in prosthodontics postgraduate education in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.

Khalid T, Yaqoob H, Syed F, Kazmi S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1541.

PMID: 39731123 PMC: 11681706. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06542-4.


The acute effect of throwing training with virtual reality on boccia competitive performance in healthy adults.

Nagao T, Maeda N, Komiya M, Tashiro T, Arima S, Kaneda K J Phys Ther Sci. 2024; 36(10):662-666.

PMID: 39354931 PMC: 11441894. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.36.662.


Challenges and opportunities in the uptake of simulation in healthcare education in the developing world: a scoping review.

Ismail F, Ajani K, Baqir S, Nadeem A, Qureshi R, Petrucka P MedEdPublish (2016). 2024; 14:38.

PMID: 39257565 PMC: 11384200. DOI: 10.12688/mep.20271.1.


Characterizing the untapped potential of virtual reality in plastic and reconstructive surgical training: A systematic review on skill transferability.

Landau M, Comeaux M, Mortell T, Boyle R, Imbrescia K, Chaffin A JPRAS Open. 2024; 41:295-310.

PMID: 39188661 PMC: 11345902. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.06.015.


Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review.

Mergen M, Graf N, Meyerheim M BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):788.

PMID: 39044186 PMC: 11267750. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05777-5.


References
1.
Cosman P, Hugh T, Shearer C, Merrett N, Biankin A, Cartmill J . Skills acquired on virtual reality laparoscopic simulators transfer into the operating room in a blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007; 125:76-81. View

2.
Parham G, Bing E, Cuevas A, Fisher B, Skinner J, Mwanahamuntu M . Creating a low-cost virtual reality surgical simulation to increase surgical oncology capacity and capability. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019; 13:910. PMC: 6445537. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.910. View

3.
Ginsburg O, Badwe R, Boyle P, Derricks G, Dare A, Evans T . Changing global policy to deliver safe, equitable, and affordable care for women's cancers. Lancet. 2016; 389(10071):871-880. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31393-9. View

4.
Fundytus A, Sullivan R, Vanderpuye V, Seruga B, Lopes G, Hammad N . Delivery of Global Cancer Care: An International Study of Medical Oncology Workload. J Glob Oncol. 2017; (4):1-11. PMC: 6180784. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.17.00126. View

5.
Sullivan R, Alatise O, Anderson B, Audisio R, Autier P, Aggarwal A . Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(11):1193-224. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00223-5. View