» Articles » PMID: 33786755

US FDA Drug Approvals Are Persistent and Polycyclic: Insights into Economic Cycles, Innovation Dynamics, and National Policy

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 31
PMID 33786755
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is challenging to elucidate the effects of changes in external influences (such as economic or policy) on the rate of US drug approvals. Here, a novel approach-termed the Chronological Hurst Exponent (CHE)-is proposed, which hypothesizes that changes in the long-range memory latent within the dynamics of time series data may be temporally associated with changes in such influences. Using the monthly number FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) approvals from 1939 to 2019 as the data source, it is demonstrated that the CHE has a distinct S-shaped structure demarcated by an 8-year (1939-1947) Stagnation Period, a 27-year (1947-1974) Emergent Period, and a 45-year (1974-2019) Saturation Period. Further, dominant periodicities (resolved via wavelet analyses) are identified during the most recent 45-year CHE Saturation Period at 17, 8 and 4 years; thus, US drug approvals have been following a Juglar/Kuznet mid-term cycle with Kitchin-like bursts. As discussed, this work suggests that (1) changes in extrinsic factors (e.g., of economic and/or policy origin) during the Emergent Period may have led to persistent growth in US drug approvals enjoyed since 1974, (2) the CHE may be a valued method to explore influences on time series data, and (3) innovation-related economic cycles exist (as viewed via the proxy metric of US drug approvals).

Citing Articles

Seasonal and Secular Periodicities Identified in the Dynamics of US FDA Medical Devices (1976-2020): Portends Intrinsic Industrial Transformation and Independence of Certain Crises.

Daizadeh I Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021; 56(1):104-116.

PMID: 34426954 PMC: 8382110. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00334-4.

References
1.
Daizadeh I, Miller D, Glowalla A, Leamer M, Nandi R, Numark C . A general approach for determining when to patent, publish, or protect information as a trade secret. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20(10):1053-4. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1002-1053. View

2.
Wouters O, Mckee M, Luyten J . Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018. JAMA. 2020; 323(9):844-853. PMC: 7054832. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166. View

3.
Munos B . Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009; 8(12):959-68. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2961. View

4.
Parida D, Mehdiratta R, Saberwal G . How many patents does a biopharmaceutical company need?. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26(7):763-6. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0708-763. View

5.
Agarwal P, Searls D . Can literature analysis identify innovation drivers in drug discovery?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009; 8(11):865-78. PMC: 7097144. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2973. View