» Articles » PMID: 33786256

The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Mar 31
PMID 33786256
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methods: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were identified on Web of Science, across all available journals and years (1950-2019). Study details, including the citation count, main subject, and outcome measures, were extracted from each article by 2 independent reviewers. The level of evidence of each study was also assessed.

Results: The 100 most-cited articles in abdominoplasty were cited by a total of 2545 articles. Citations per article ranged from 206 to 34 (mean 65). Overall, 50 articles were assessed to be level of evidence 3, which is representative of the large number of cohort studies (n = 59) on the list. Similar numbers achieved levels 2, 4, and 5 (n = 16, 20, and 14), though none reached level 1. The main subject was operative technique in 50 articles, followed by outcomes in 34 articles. Only 7 articles utilized objective cosmetic outcome measures. Patient-reported outcome measures were employed in 25 articles, though only 5 incorporated validated questionnaires.

Conclusions: The most-cited research in abdominoplasty largely comprised low-to-moderate quality studies, with no article achieving the highest level of evidence. Contemporary high-quality evidence incorporating validated outcome measures is crucial to enhance shared decision-making, particularly in aesthetic procedures.

Citing Articles

The 100 Most-cited Articles in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Ruccia F, Elmorsi R, Dhandapani K, Alzaid M, Bailon-Valdez Z, Tammasse I Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(8):e6033.

PMID: 39139843 PMC: 11319319. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006033.


Global Research Trends and Perspectives of Blepharoplasty: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on Web of Science.

Gao H, Wu D, Jie X, Hu Z, Zhang W, Zhu L Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 47(2):654-665.

PMID: 36203097 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03116-x.


TULUA: Effects of Flap Undermining and Type of Wall Plicature in a Rat Model Abdominoplasty.

Villegas-Alzate F, Caycedo-Garcia D, Malaver-Acero R, Hidalgo-Ibarra S, Cardona V, Villegas-Mesa J Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021; 46(1):456-467.

PMID: 34424368 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02501-2.

References
1.
Waljee J, Larson B, Chung K . Measuring treatment effectiveness: a guide to incorporating the principles of evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130(6):1382-1394. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826da054. View

2.
BAROUDI R . Why aesthetic plastic surgery became popular in Brazil. Ann Plast Surg. 1991; 27(5):396-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199111000-00002. View

3.
Sinha Y, Iqbal F, Spence J, Richard B . A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-cited Articles in Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4(7):e820. PMC: 4977148. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000834. View

4.
Chang E, Pannucci C, Wilkins E . Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: a 10-year review. Aesthet Surg J. 2009; 29(2):144-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.12.007. View

5.
Eaves 3rd F, Rohrich R, Sykes J . Taking evidence-based plastic surgery to the next level: report of the second Summit on Evidence-based Plastic Surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33(5):735-43. DOI: 10.1177/1090820X13493766. View