» Articles » PMID: 33784471

Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth

Overview
Date 2021 Mar 30
PMID 33784471
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose The challenges associated with cochlear implant (CI)-mediated listening are well documented; however, they can be mitigated through the provision of aided acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear-a configuration termed . This study extends previous literature to examine the effect of acoustic bandwidth in the non-CI ear for music perception. The primary aim was to determine the minimum and optimum acoustic bandwidth necessary to obtain bimodal benefit for music perception and speech perception. Method Participants included 12 adult bimodal listeners and 12 adult control listeners with normal hearing. Music perception was assessed via measures of timbre perception and subjective sound quality of real-world music samples. Speech perception was assessed via monosyllabic word recognition in quiet. Acoustic stimuli were presented to the non-CI ear in the following filter conditions: < 125, < 250, < 500, and < 750 Hz, and wideband (full bandwidth). Results Generally, performance for all stimuli improved with increasing acoustic bandwidth; however, the bandwidth that is both minimally and optimally beneficial may be dependent upon stimulus type. On average, music sound quality required wideband amplification, whereas speech recognition with a male talker in quiet required a narrower acoustic bandwidth (< 250 Hz) for significant benefit. Still, average speech recognition performance continued to improve with increasing bandwidth. Conclusion Further research is warranted to examine optimal acoustic bandwidth for additional stimulus types; however, these findings indicate that wideband amplification is most appropriate for speech and music perception in individuals with bimodal hearing.

Citing Articles

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study Across Multiple Hearing Domains.

Pantaleo A, Curatoli L, Cavallaro G, Auricchio D, Murri A, Quaranta N Audiol Res. 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39846559 PMC: 11755453. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15010006.


Music Perception, Appreciation, and Participation in Postlingually Deafened Adults and Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Literature Review.

Bleckly F, Lo C, Rapport F, Clay-Williams R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241287391.

PMID: 39582273 PMC: 11587190. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241287391.


Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation to Speech Perception in Noise and Silence.

Dourado R, Caldas F, Cardoso C, Santos D, Bahmad Jr F Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 27(4):e645-e653.

PMID: 37876694 PMC: 10593532. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761169.


Integration of fundamental frequency and voice-onset-time to voicing categorization: Listeners with normal hearing and bimodal hearing configurations.

Buz E, Dwyer N, Lai W, Watson D, Gifford R J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(3):1580.

PMID: 37002096 PMC: 9995168. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017429.


Translational Applications of Machine Learning in Auditory Electrophysiology.

Smith S Semin Hear. 2022; 43(3):240-250.

PMID: 36313047 PMC: 9605807. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756166.


References
1.
Parkinson A, Rubinstein J, Drennan W, Dodson C, Nie K . Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2019; 40(3):e283-e289. PMC: 6522254. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002126. View

2.
Yuksel M, Meredith M, Rubinstein J . Effects of Low Frequency Residual Hearing on Music Perception and Psychoacoustic Abilities in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:924. PMC: 6733978. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00924. View

3.
Shirvani S, Jafari Z, Motasaddi Zarandi M, Jalaie S, Mohagheghi H, Tale M . Emotional Perception of Music in Children With Bimodal Fitting and Unilateral Cochlear Implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 125(6):470-7. DOI: 10.1177/0003489415619943. View

4.
Nater U, Abbruzzese E, Krebs M, Ehlert U . Sex differences in emotional and psychophysiological responses to musical stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006; 62(2):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.05.011. View

5.
Luo X, Fu Q, Galvin 3rd J . Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Trends Amplif. 2007; 11(4):301-15. PMC: 4111530. DOI: 10.1177/1084713807305301. View