» Articles » PMID: 33779478

The Association Between Self-reported Physical Activity and Objective Measures of Physical Activity in Participants with Newly Diagnosed Bipolar Disorder, Unaffected Relatives, and Healthy Individuals

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialties Pharmacology
Psychiatry
Date 2021 Mar 29
PMID 33779478
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The association between the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and objective measures of physical activity has never been evaluated in participants with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder (BD). Our aim was to compare IPAQ-SF to objective measures in participants with newly diagnosed BD, their unaffected first-degree relatives (UR), and healthy control individuals (HC) in groups combined and stratified by group.

Materials And Methods: Physical activity measurements were collected on 20 participants with newly diagnosed BD, 20 of their UR, and 20 HC using individually calibrated combined acceleration and heart rate sensing (Actiheart) for seven days. IPAQ-SF was self-completed at baseline. Correlation between measurements from the two methods was examined with Spearman rank correlation coefficient and agreement levels examined with modified Bland-Altman plots.

Results: Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) from IPAQ-SF was weakly but significantly positively correlated with physical activity estimates measured using acceleration and heart rate in groups combined (Actiheart PAEE) (ρ= 0.301,  0.02). Correlations for each group were positive, but only in UR were it statistically significant (BD:  = 0.18, UR:  = 0.007, HC:  = 0.84). Self-reported PAEE and moderate-intensity were markedly underestimated [PAEE in all participants combined: 62.7 (Actiheart) vs. 24.3 kJ/day/kg (IPAQ-SF),  < 0.001], while vigorous-intensity was overestimated. Bland-Altman plots indicated proportional bias.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the use of the IPAQ-SF to monitor levels of physical activity in participants with newly diagnosed BD, in a psychiatric clinical setting, should be used with caution and consideration.

References
1.
Raask T, Maestu J, Latt E, Jurimae J, Jurimae T, Vainik U . Comparison of IPAQ-SF and Two Other Physical Activity Questionnaires with Accelerometer in Adolescent Boys. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0169527. PMC: 5215940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169527. View

2.
Faurholt-Jepsen M, Brage S, Vinberg M, Jensen H, Christensen E, Knorr U . Electronic monitoring of psychomotor activity as a supplementary objective measure of depression severity. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014; 69(2):118-25. DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2014.936501. View

3.
Mitchell P, Frankland A, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Roberts G, Corry J, Wright A . Comparison of depressive episodes in bipolar disorder and in major depressive disorder within bipolar disorder pedigrees. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 199(4):303-9. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.088823. View

4.
Monyeki M, Moss S, Kemper H, Twisk J . Self-Reported Physical Activity is Not a Valid Method for Measuring Physical Activity in 15-Year-Old South African Boys and Girls. Children (Basel). 2018; 5(6). PMC: 6025032. DOI: 10.3390/children5060071. View

5.
Beigel A, Murphy D . Unipolar and bipolar affective illness. Differences in clinical characteristics accompanying depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1971; 24(3):215-20. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750090021003. View