» Articles » PMID: 33777611

Diabetes-related Acute Metabolic Emergencies in COVID-19 Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Diabetol Int
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 Mar 29
PMID 33777611
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: COVID-19 is associated with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) and euglycaemic DKA (EDKA); however, evidence regarding parameters affecting outcome and mortality rates is scarce.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, and Google Scholar from January 2020 to 7 January 2021 to identify all studies describing clinical profile, outcome and mortality rates regarding DKA, HHS, DKA/HHS and EDKA cases in COVID-19 patients. The appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for quality assessment; quality of evidence was approached using GRADE. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess correlations between clinical characteristics and outcome based on case reports. Combined mortality rates (CMR) were estimated from data reported in case report series, cross-sectional studies, and meta-analyses. The protocol was submitted to PROSPERO (ID: 229356/230737).

Results: From 312 identified publications, 44 were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. Critical COVID-19 necessitating ICU ( = 3 × 10), DKA/HHS presence ( = 0.021), and AKI ( = 0.037) were independently correlated with death. Increased COVID-19 severity ( = 0.003), elevated lactates ( < 0.001), augmented anion gap ( < 0.001), and AKI ( = 0.002) were associated with DKA/HHS. SGLT-2i were linked with EDKA ( = 0.004) and negatively associated with AKI ( = 0.023). CMR was 27.1% (95% CI 11.2-46.9%) with considerable heterogeneity (  = 67%).

Conclusion: Acute diabetes-related metabolic emergencies in COVID-19 patients lead to increased mortality; key determinants are critical COVID-19 illness, coexistence of DKA/HHS and AKI. Previous SGLT-2i treatment, though associated with EDKA, might preserve renal function in COVID-19 patients.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-021-00502-9.

Citing Articles

The effects of iron deficient and high iron diets on SARS-CoV-2 lung infection and disease.

Carolin A, Frazer D, Yan K, Bishop C, Tang B, Nguyen W Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1441495.

PMID: 39296289 PMC: 11408339. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1441495.


Trends in diabetic ketoacidosis- and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state-related mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A population-based study.

He X, Huang A, Lv F, Gao X, Guo Y, Liu Y J Diabetes. 2024; 16(8):e13591.

PMID: 39136498 PMC: 11320749. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13591.


Association between anion gap and the 30-day mortality of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia: a study of the MIMIC-III database.

Yu H, Chen S J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(5):2994-3006.

PMID: 38883665 PMC: 11170422. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1735.


Changes in lifestyle-related behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a questionnaire survey for examinees who underwent an annual health check-up.

Kishimoto M, Masuko K, Yamamoto S, Fujita R, Nakamura S, Odawara M J Int Med Res. 2023; 51(7):3000605231184036.

PMID: 37421140 PMC: 10331353. DOI: 10.1177/03000605231184036.


Effect of Antidiabetic Therapy on Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhan K, Weng L, Qi L, Wang L, Lin H, Fang X Ann Pharmacother. 2022; 57(7):776-786.

PMID: 36314281 PMC: 9618918. DOI: 10.1177/10600280221133577.


References
1.
Fadini G, de Kreutzenberg S, Rigato M, Brocco S, Marchesan M, Tiengo A . Characteristics and outcomes of the hyperglycemic hyperosmolar non-ketotic syndrome in a cohort of 51 consecutive cases at a single center. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011; 94(2):172-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.018. View

2.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

3.
Ma L, Wang Y, Yang Z, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng X . Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?. Mil Med Res. 2020; 7(1):7. PMC: 7049186. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8. View

4.
Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. PMC: 5833365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. View

5.
Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H . A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 1(2):97-111. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.12. View