» Articles » PMID: 33776921

Obesity and Male Reproduction; Placing the Western Diet in Context

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2021 Mar 29
PMID 33776921
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is mounting evidence that obesity has negative repercussions for reproductive physiology in males. Much of this evidence has accumulated from rodent studies employing diets high in fat and sugar ("high fat" or "western" diets). While excessive fats and carbohydrates have long been considered major determinants of diet induced obesity, a growing body of research suggests that the relationships between diet composition and obesity are more complex than originally thought, involving interactions between dietary macronutrients. However, rodent dietary models have yet to evolve to capture this, instead relying heavily on elevated levels of a single macronutrient. While this approach has highlighted important effects of obesity on male reproduction, it does not allow for interpretation of the complex, interacting effects of dietary protein, carbohydrate and fat. Further, the single nutrient approach limits the ability to draw conclusions about which diets best support reproductive function. Nutritional Geometry offers an alternative approach, assessing outcomes of interest over an extended range of dietary macronutrient compositions. This review explores the practical application of Nutritional Geometry to study the effects of dietary macronutrient balance on male reproduction, including experimental considerations specific to studies of diet and reproductive physiology. Finally, this review discusses the promising use of Nutritional Geometry in the development of evidence-based pre-conception nutritional guidance for men.

Citing Articles

The association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and sperm quality parameters: a cross-sectional study.

Soltani M, Ahmadi M, Shateri Z, Maghsoudi Z, Rajabzadeh-Dehkordi M, Askarpour M BMC Res Notes. 2025; 18(1):48.

PMID: 39891278 PMC: 11786443. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-025-07107-4.


Diet-induced Obesity: Pathophysiology, Consequences and Target Specific Therapeutic Strategies.

Banerjee M, Pandey V Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2024; 26(2):113-124.

PMID: 39225225 DOI: 10.2174/0113892037329528240827180820.


Paternal dietary macronutrient balance and energy intake drive metabolic and behavioral differences among offspring.

Crean A, Senior A, Freire T, Clark T, Mackay F, Austin G Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2982.

PMID: 38582785 PMC: 10998877. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46782-y.


Grain versus AIN: Common rodent diets differentially affect health outcomes in adult C57BL/6j mice.

Schipper L, Tims S, Timmer E, Lohr J, Rakhshandehroo M, Harvey L PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0293487.

PMID: 38512932 PMC: 10956799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293487.


Effect of Advanced Glycation end Products (AGEs) on Sperm Parameters and Function in C57Bl/6 Mice.

Darmishonnejad Z, Zadeh V, Tavalaee M, Kobarfard F, Hassani M, Gharagozloo P Reprod Sci. 2024; 31(7):2114-2122.

PMID: 38480649 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01507-w.


References
1.
Ferraretti A, Nygren K, Nyboe Andersen A, de Mouzon J, Kupka M, Calhaz-Jorge C . Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2017(2):hox012. PMC: 6276702. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox012. View

2.
Kenny D, Byrne C . Review: The effect of nutrition on timing of pubertal onset and subsequent fertility in the bull. Animal. 2018; 12(s1):s36-s44. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000514. View

3.
Harrison S, Raubenheimer D, Simpson S, Godin J, Bertram S . Towards a synthesis of frameworks in nutritional ecology: interacting effects of protein, carbohydrate and phosphorus on field cricket fitness. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1792). PMC: 4150310. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0539. View

4.
Raubenheimer D, Simpson S . Protein Leverage: Theoretical Foundations and Ten Points of Clarification. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(8):1225-1238. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22531. View

5.
Simpson S, Raubenheimer D . Obesity: the protein leverage hypothesis. Obes Rev. 2005; 6(2):133-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00178.x. View