» Articles » PMID: 33776672

Remedial Training of the Less-Impaired Arm in Chronic Stroke Survivors With Moderate to Severe Upper-Extremity Paresis Improves Functional Independence: A Pilot Study

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Mar 29
PMID 33776672
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ipsilesional arm of stroke patients often has functionally limiting deficits in motor control and dexterity that depend on the side of the brain that is lesioned and that increase with the severity of paretic arm impairment. However, remediation of the ipsilesional arm has yet to be integrated into the usual standard of care for upper limb rehabilitation in stroke, largely due to a lack of translational research examining the effects of ipsilesional-arm intervention. We now ask whether ipsilesional-arm training, tailored to the hemisphere-specific nature of ipsilesional-arm motor deficits in participants with moderate to severe contralesional paresis, improves ipsilesional arm performance and generalizes to improve functional independence. We assessed the effects of this intervention on ipsilesional arm unilateral performance [Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JHFT)], ipsilesional grip strength, contralesional arm impairment level [Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FM)], and functional independence [Functional independence measure (FIM)] ( = 13). Intervention occurred over a 3 week period for 1.5 h/session, three times each week. All sessions included virtual reality tasks that targeted the specific motor control deficits associated with either left or right hemisphere damage, followed by graded dexterity training in real-world tasks. We also exposed participants to 3 weeks of sham training to control for the non-specific effects of therapy visits and interactions. We conducted five test-sessions: two pre-tests and three post-tests. Our results indicate substantial improvements in the less-impaired arm performance, without detriment to the paretic arm that transferred to improved functional independence in all three posttests, indicating durability of training effects for at least 3 weeks. We provide evidence for establishing the basis of a rehabilitation approach that includes evaluation and remediation of the ipsilesional arm in moderately to severely impaired stroke survivors. This study was originally a crossover design; however, we were unable to complete the second arm of the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We report the results from the first arm of the planned design as a longitudinal study.

Citing Articles

Implicit motor sequence learning using three-dimensional reaching movements with the non-dominant left arm.

Smith C, Baird J, Buitendorp J, Horton H, Watkins M, Stewart J Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(12):2715-2726.

PMID: 39377917 PMC: 11569025. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06934-4.


The independence of impairments in proprioception and visuomotor adaptation after stroke.

Moore R, Piitz M, Singh N, Dukelow S, Cluff T J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):81.

PMID: 38762552 PMC: 11102216. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01360-7.


The complementary dominance hypothesis: a model for remediating the 'good' hand in stroke survivors.

Kitchen N, Dexheimer B, Yuk J, Maenza C, Ruelos P, Kim T J Physiol. 2024; 603(3):663-683.

PMID: 38733166 PMC: 11610521. DOI: 10.1113/JP285561.


Roles of Handedness and Hemispheric Lateralization: Implications for Rehabilitation of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems: A Rapid Review.

Dexheimer B, Sainburg R, Sharp S, Philip B Am J Occup Ther. 2024; 78(2).

PMID: 38305818 PMC: 11017742. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050398.


High-Frequency Ipsilesional versus Low-Frequency Contralesional Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation after Stroke: Differential Effects on Ipsilesional Upper Extremity Motor Recovery.

Petruseviciene L, Sack A, Kubilius R, Savickas R Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(11).

PMID: 38004004 PMC: 10672822. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111955.


References
1.
Daving Y, Andren E, Nordholm L, Grimby G . Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure. Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15(3):301-10. DOI: 10.1191/026921501669986659. View

2.
Stinear C . Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(12):1228-1232. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7. View

3.
Sainburg R, Maenza C, Winstein C, Good D . Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016; 957:257-272. PMC: 5364330. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_14. View

4.
Jones R, Donaldson I, Parkin P . Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction. Brain. 1989; 112 ( Pt 1):113-32. DOI: 10.1093/brain/112.1.113. View

5.
Pohl P, Winstein C . Practice effects on the less-affected upper extremity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(6):668-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90170-3. View