» Articles » PMID: 33772604

The State of TURP Through a Historical Lens

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2021 Mar 27
PMID 33772604
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 1926 Maximilian Stern introduced a new instrument to treat obstructions at the vesical orifice and baptized it resectoscope. With reference to astonishing historical statements about the new instrument and surgical technique made by the pioneers and their critics we will value why transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for most men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement. TURP is currently challenged by recently introduced new instruments and techniques claiming advantages over TURP. However, TURP offers an excellent balance between high efficacy in symptom relieve and low morbidity along with low costs and favorable long term outcome compared to other treatment options. We will outline these arguments demonstrating that even after a century has elapsed, since its introduction into the urologists armamentarium, TURP continues to stand the passage of time.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the utility of the HAS-BLED bleeding-estimator tool for transurethral resection of prostate.

Kuo L, Lim Z, Letch C, Silverman J, Kim J, McClintock S BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e480.

PMID: 39877584 PMC: 11771491. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.480.


Transurethral resection of the prostate across continents: a meta-analysis evaluating quality of gold standard in the twenty-first century.

Porto J, Bhatia A, Bhat A, Suarez Arbelaez M, Blachman-Braun R, Shah K World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):85.

PMID: 39856398 PMC: 11761131. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05439-7.


Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Porto J, Bhatia A, Bhat A, Suarez Arbelaez M, Blachman-Braun R, Shah K World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):639.

PMID: 39547977 PMC: 11568034. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05332-3.


Current era HOLEP with MOSES 2.0 technology compared to the gold standard TURP.

Michael J, Xu P, Dean N, Ganesh M, Tsai K, Khondakar N World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):633.

PMID: 39514127 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05309-2.


Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate.

Kuo L, Kuo J, Silverman J, Kim J, Letch C, McClintock S BJU Int. 2024; 134 Suppl 2:30-37.

PMID: 39210619 PMC: 11603099. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16478.


References
1.
Martin H . Cysto-Urethroscopic Resection of the Prostate. Cal West Med. 1932; 36(2):76-9. PMC: 1658134. View

2.
Matta R, Dvorani E, Wallis C, Hird A, LaBossiere J, Kulkarni G . Complications after surgery for benign prostatic enlargement: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open. 2020; 9(12):e032170. PMC: 6955543. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032170. View

3.
Alexander C, Scullion M, Omar M, Yuan Y, Mamoulakis C, NDow J . Reprint - Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14(12):423-430. PMC: 7704097. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6464. View

4.
Furuya S, Furuya R, Ogura H, Araki T, Arita T . [A study of 4,031 patients of transurethral resection of the prostate performed by one surgeon: learning curve, surgical results and postoperative complications]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2006; 52(8):609-14. View

5.
Kailavasan M, Berridge C, Athanasiadis G, Gkentzis A, Rai B, Jain S . Design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel curriculum to teach transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a 3-year experience of urology simulation bootcamp course. World J Urol. 2020; 38(11):2899-2906. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03104-3. View