Mismatch in Supply and Demand for Neuro-Ophthalmic Care
Overview
Ophthalmology
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Previous research suggests the number of neuro-ophthalmologists in the United States may be below a level that provides sufficient access to neuro-ophthalmic care in much of the United States. However, national estimates of the amount of clinical time spent on neuro-ophthalmology are lacking.
Methods: The North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society administered a survey on professional time allocation to its active members. Survey response was 95%. The survey characterized the hours each week each respondent allocated to overall work, clinical work, clinical work in ophthalmology/neurology, and clinical work in neuro-ophthalmology specifically. The survey additionally collected information regarding demographics, current wait times to be seen for new patients, and the difference in clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology spent between the current day compared with that shortly after completing clinical training. Linear regression was used to identify potential relationships between the above and average wait time.
Results: On average, responding physicians spent 70% of their clinical time on neuro-ophthalmology. In 6 states, there were no reported practicing neuro-ophthalmologists, and in only 8 states was the clinical full-time equivalent to population ratio below the suggested threshold of 1 for every 1.2 million. The median wait time for a new patient was 6 weeks. This wait time was associated with the fraction of clinical time spent in neuro-ophthalmology (0.2 weeks longer wait for a 10 percentage point increase in the fraction of time spent in neuro-ophthalmology; P = 0.02), and suggestively associated with training (training in ophthalmology was associated with 1.0 week shorter wait time; P = 0.06).
Conclusion: The survey suggests that neuro-ophthalmologists are unable to see patients in a timely manner and a decreasing number of clinicians are entering the field. Future interventions should be considered to incentivize neuro-ophthalmology training in ophthalmology and neurology residents such that the United States population is able to appropriately access neuro-ophthalmic care.
Physician Assistants in Neuro-Ophthalmology.
Warner J, Krikova I Neuroophthalmology. 2025; 49(2):123-126.
PMID: 40051717 PMC: 11881863. DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2024.2435311.
Bouthour W, Bruce B, Newman N, Biousse V Eye (Lond). 2024; 39(1):185-191.
PMID: 39478195 PMC: 11732981. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03408-3.
Loebel E, Stein L, Fara M, Farouk S, Chadha N Neurol Educ. 2024; 2(1):e200052.
PMID: 39411117 PMC: 11473086. DOI: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200052.
Mollan S, Menon V, Cunningham A, Plant G, Bennetto L, Wong S Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(12):2235-2237.
PMID: 38778141 PMC: 11306774. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03141-x.
Glaucoma as a cause of optic nerve abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging.
Mosleh R, Labella Alvarez F, Bouthour W, Saindane A, Dattilo M, Bruce B Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(9):1626-1632.
PMID: 38355669 PMC: 11156972. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-02964-y.