Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery

Overview

Journal J Chest Surg

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2021 Mar 26

PMID 33767030

Authors

Suk Ho Sohn

Seung Hyun Kim

Ho Young Hwang

Ki-Bong Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the mid-term outcomes and angiographic patency of redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: Of 2,851 patients who underwent isolated CABG at Seoul National University Hospital from 2000 to 2017, 88 underwent redo CABG. Patients' mean age at redo CABG was 66.0±8.0 years. The mean interval between the first-time and redo CABG was 113.0±62.4 months. The mean follow-up duration was 86 months. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes were evaluated. Angiographic patency rates were evaluated early (1-2 days), 1 year, and 5 years after surgery. Comparative analyses between on-pump and off-pump CABG were also performed.

Results: The culprits for reoperation were previous grafts (65.6%), native coronary vessels (17.8%), and both (16.7%). Off-pump CABG was performed in 75 cases (85.2%), and the mean number of distal anastomoses was 1.8±0.8. The saphenous vein (39.7%) was used most frequently, followed by the right internal thoracic artery (28.4%), right gastroepiploic artery (21.3%), left internal thoracic artery (7.8%), and radial artery (2.8%). Operative mortality was 1.1%. The overall survival, cumulative incidence of cardiac death, and cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events were 71.3%,12.0%, and 23.3% at 5 years after surgery, respectively. The overall angiographic patency rates were 95.7%, 90.1%, and 92.2% on early, 1-year, and 5-year angiograms, respectively. The angiographic patency rates of saphenous vein grafts were 93.1%, 85.6%, and 91.3% on early, 1-year, and 5-year angiograms, respectively. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or angiographic patency rates were observed between the on-pump (n=13) versus off-pump (n=75) groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p=0.005) and chronic kidney disease (HR, 3.85; p=0.001) were risk factors for all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: Redo CABG could mostly be performed using the off-pump technique and did not show increased operative mortality and morbidities.

References

Hillis L, Smith P, Anderson J, Bittl J, Bridges C, Byrne J . 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011; 124(23):2610-42. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b5fee. View

Varghese I, Samuel J, Banerjee S, Brilakis E . Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention in native coronary arteries vs. bypass grafts in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009; 10(2):103-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.12.002. View

Tugtekin S, Alexiou K, Kappert U, Esche H, Joskowiak D, Knaut M . Coronary reoperation with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006; 95(2):93-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-0335-5. View

Kim K, Choi J, Oh S, Hwang H, Kim J, Choi J . Twenty-Year Experience With Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Early Postoperative Angiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 109(4):1112-1119. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.053. View

Sabik 3rd J, Blackstone E, Houghtaling P, Walts P, Lytle B . Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80(5):1719-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.033. View

Yap C, Sposato L, Akowuah E, Theodore S, Dinh D, Shardey G . Contemporary results show repeat coronary artery bypass grafting remains a risk factor for operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87(5):1386-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.006. View

Kara I, Cakalagaoglu C, Ay Y, Al Salehi S, Yanartas M, Anasiz H . Reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery: the role of on-pump and off-pump techniques on factors affecting hospital mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 19(6):435-40. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02043. View

Cole J, Jones E, Craver J, Guyton R, Morris D, Douglas J . Outcomes of repeat revascularization in diabetic patients with prior coronary surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40(11):1968-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02561-5. View

Fitzgibbon G, Burton J, Leach A . Coronary bypass graft fate: angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1132 after one year. Circulation. 1978; 57(6):1070-74. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.57.6.1070. View

10.

Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet J, Cremer J, Falk V . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special.... Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(37):2541-619. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. View

11.

Maltais S, Widmer R, Bell M, Daly R, Dearani J, Greason K . Reoperation for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Outcomes and Considerations for Expanding Interventional Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 103(6):1886-1892. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.09.097. View

12.

Bruno V, Zakkar M, Rapetto F, Rathore A, Marsico R, Chivasso P . Early health outcome and 10-year survival in patients undergoing redo coronary surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 52(5):945-951. PMC: 5848803. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx137. View

13.

Dohi M, Miyata H, Doi K, Okawa K, Motomura N, Takamoto S . The off-pump technique in redo coronary artery bypass grafting reduces mortality and major morbidities: propensity score analysis of data from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 47(2):299-307. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu081. View

14.

Spiliotopoulos K, Maganti M, Brister S, Rao V . Changing pattern of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: a 20-year study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.104. View

15.

Di Mauro M, Iaco A, Contini M, Teodori G, Vitolla G, Pano M . Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 79(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.058. View

16.

Czerny M, Zimpfer D, Kilo J, Gottardi R, Dunkler D, Wolner E . Coronary reoperations: recurrence of angina and clinical outcome with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75(3):847-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04652-0. View

17.

Ghanta R, Kaneko T, Gammie J, Sheng S, Aranki S . Evolving trends of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145(2):364-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.051. View

18.

Yau T, Borger M, Weisel R, Ivanov J . The changing pattern of reoperative coronary surgery: trends in 1230 consecutive reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120(1):156-63. DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2000.106983. View

19.

CAREY J, Cukingnan R, Singer L . Quality of life after myocardial revascularization. Effect of increasing age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992; 103(1):108-15. View

20.

Sousa-Uva M, Neumann F, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning A, Benedetto U . 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 55(1):4-90. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy289. View