» Articles » PMID: 33762959

Meta-Analysis of ABCG2 and ABCB1 Polymorphisms With Sunitinib-Induced Toxicity and Efficacy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2021 Mar 25
PMID 33762959
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

ABCG2 and ABCB1 are genes related to the pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and have been associated with its toxicity and efficacy. However, the results have been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of ABCG2 and ABCB1 polymorphisms with sunitinib-induced toxicity and efficacy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by meta-analysis. , and e were systematically searched for studies investigating the associations of the ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphism with sunitinib-induced toxicity and the associations of the ABCB1 rs1128503 and ABCB1 rs2032582 polymorphisms with sunitinib-induced toxicity and clinical outcomes. The associations were evaluated by effect size (ES) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eight and five studies were included in the toxicity and efficacy analysis, respectively, including a total of 1081 RCC patients. The ABCG2 rs2231142 A allele was associated with an increased risk of sunitinib-induced thrombocytopenia and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in Asians (ES = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.15-2.36, = 0.006; ES = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.02-2.27, = 0.041). However, the ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphism was not associated with sunitinib-induced hypertension or neutropenia (ES = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.69-1.73, = 0.701; ES = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.57-1.31, = 0.501). Compared with the C allele, the ABCB1 rs1128503 T allele was associated with a decreased risk of sunitinib-induced hypertension but worse progression-free survival (PFS) (ES = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26-0.77, = 0.004; ES = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.07-1.73, = 0.011). There was no significant association between the T allele or C allele of ABCB1 rs1128503 and overall survival (OS) (ES = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.61-1.10, = 0.184). The ABCB1 rs2032582 T allele was associated with worse PFS than the other alleles (ES = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.14-1.87, = 0.003), while there was no significant association between the T allele or other alleles and sunitinib-induced hypertension, HFS, or OS (ES = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.46-1.29, = 0.326; ES = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.65-1.62, = 0.919; ES = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.85-2.05, = 0.215). The results indicate that the ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphism may serve as a predictor of sunitinib-induced thrombocytopenia and HFS in Asians, while the ABCB1 rs1128503 polymorphism may serve as a predictor of sunitinib-induced hypertension, and both the ABCB1 rs1128503 and rs2032582 polymorphisms may serve as predictors of PFS in RCC. These results suggest a possible application of individualized use of sunitinib according to the genetic background of patients.

Citing Articles

Apatinib-Induced Hypertension Correlates with Improved Prognosis in Solid Tumor Patients.

Li C, Ma J, Wang Q, Ma L, Han J, Qi Y Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2025; 25(4):570-581.

PMID: 40048128 DOI: 10.1007/s12012-025-09980-8.


Pharmacogenomics in Targeted Therapy and Supportive Care Therapies for Cancer.

Talebi Z, Sparreboom A, Colace S Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2547:47-61.

PMID: 36068460 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2573-6_3.


Meta-analysis of the associations of IMPDH and UGT1A9 polymorphisms with rejection in kidney transplant recipients taking mycophenolic acid.

Cheng L, Yao P, Weng B, Yang M, Wang Q Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 78(8):1227-1238.

PMID: 35524809 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03311-4.


Pharmacogenetics of Drugs Used in the Treatment of Cancers.

Franczyk B, Rysz J, Gluba-Brzozka A Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(2).

PMID: 35205356 PMC: 8871547. DOI: 10.3390/genes13020311.


Genophenotypic Factors and Pharmacogenomics in Adverse Drug Reactions.

Cacabelos R, Naidoo V, Corzo L, Cacabelos N, Carril J Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(24).

PMID: 34948113 PMC: 8704264. DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413302.

References
1.
Diekstra M, Swen J, Boven E, Castellano D, Gelderblom H, Mathijssen R . CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms as predictors for sunitinib outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(4):621-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.018. View

2.
Kalantari H . Predictive factors for severe toxicity of sunitinib in unselected patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101(7):1222-3. PMC: 2768102. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605303. View

3.
Lee S, Bang Y, Mainwaring P, Ng C, Chang J, Kwong P . Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an ethnic Asian subpopulation analysis for safety and efficacy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014; 10(3):237-45. DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12163. View

4.
Tomita Y, Shinohara N, Yuasa T, Fujimoto H, Niwakawa M, Mugiya S . Overall survival and updated results from a phase II study of sunitinib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40(12):1166-72. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq146. View

5.
Cheng L, Wang Y, Li X, Feng W, Weng B, Yuan Q . Meta-analysis of the associations of CYP2B6-516G>T polymorphisms with efavirenz-induced central nervous system side effects and virological outcome in HIV-infected adults. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019; 20(2):246-259. DOI: 10.1038/s41397-019-0112-2. View