» Articles » PMID: 33762019

Perspective of Mesenchymal Transformation in Glioblastoma

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Mar 25
PMID 33762019
Citations 57
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, glioblastoma (GBM), a grade IV primary brain tumor, still portends a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 12-16 months. The complexity of GBM treatment mainly lies in the inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, which largely contributes to the treatment-refractory and recurrent nature of GBM. By paving the road towards the development of personalized medicine for GBM patients, the cancer genome atlas classification scheme of GBM into distinct transcriptional subtypes has been considered an invaluable approach to overcoming this heterogeneity. Among the identified transcriptional subtypes, the mesenchymal subtype has been found associated with more aggressive, invasive, angiogenic, hypoxic, necrotic, inflammatory, and multitherapy-resistant features than other transcriptional subtypes. Accordingly, mesenchymal GBM patients were found to exhibit worse prognosis than other subtypes when patients with high transcriptional heterogeneity were excluded. Furthermore, identification of the master mesenchymal regulators and their downstream signaling pathways has not only increased our understanding of the complex regulatory transcriptional networks of mesenchymal GBM, but also has generated a list of potent inhibitors for clinical trials. Importantly, the mesenchymal transition of GBM has been found to be tightly associated with treatment-induced phenotypic changes in recurrence. Together, these findings indicate that elucidating the governing and plastic transcriptomic natures of mesenchymal GBM is critical in order to develop novel and selective therapeutic strategies that can improve both patient care and clinical outcomes. Thus, the focus of our review will be on the recent advances in the understanding of the transcriptome of mesenchymal GBM and discuss microenvironmental, metabolic, and treatment-related factors as critical components through which the mesenchymal signature may be acquired. We also take into consideration the transcriptomic plasticity of GBM to discuss the future perspectives in employing selective therapeutic strategies against mesenchymal GBM.

Citing Articles

The radiogenomic and spatiogenomic landscapes of glioblastoma and their relationship to oncogenic drivers.

Kazerooni A, Akbari H, Hu X, Bommineni V, Grigoriadis D, Toorens E Commun Med (Lond). 2025; 5(1):55.

PMID: 40025245 PMC: 11873127. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-00767-0.


LDH Isoenzyme and GAA-BSA Nanoparticles: A Novel Therapy Approach for Proneural Subtype Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Yang M, Han X, Li H, Du F, Feng C, Gong A J Cancer. 2025; 16(4):1101-1117.

PMID: 39895794 PMC: 11786042. DOI: 10.7150/jca.98452.


It's all downstream from here: RTK/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway resistance mechanisms in glioblastoma.

Yakubov R, Kaloti R, Persaud P, McCracken A, Zadeh G, Bunda S J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39821893 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04930-w.


Invasion of glioma cells through confined space requires membrane tension regulation and mechano-electrical coupling via Plexin-B2.

Junqueira Alves C, Hannah T, Sadia S, Kolsteeg C, Dixon A, Wiener R Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):272.

PMID: 39747004 PMC: 11697315. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55056-6.


Resistance to spindle inhibitors in glioblastoma depends on STAT3 and therapy induced senescence.

Zarco N, Dovas A, de Araujo Farias V, Nagaiah N, Haddock A, Sims P iScience. 2024; 27(12):111311.

PMID: 39640583 PMC: 11617384. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111311.


References
1.
Agnihotri S, Zadeh G . Metabolic reprogramming in glioblastoma: the influence of cancer metabolism on epigenetics and unanswered questions. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 18(2):160-72. PMC: 4724176. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov125. View

2.
Akkari L, Bowman R, Tessier J, Klemm F, Handgraaf S, de Groot M . Dynamic changes in glioma macrophage populations after radiotherapy reveal CSF-1R inhibition as a strategy to overcome resistance. Sci Transl Med. 2020; 12(552). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw7843. View

3.
Aytes A, Mitrofanova A, Lefebvre C, Alvarez M, Castillo-Martin M, Zheng T . Cross-species regulatory network analysis identifies a synergistic interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that drives prostate cancer malignancy. Cancer Cell. 2014; 25(5):638-651. PMC: 4051317. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.017. View

4.
Bahadur S, Sahu A, Baghel P, Saha S . Current promising treatment strategy for glioblastoma multiform: A review. Oncol Rev. 2019; 13(2):417. PMC: 6661528. DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2019.417. View

5.
Bai Y, Chen Y, Hong X, Liu X, Su X, Li S . Newcastle disease virus enhances the growth-inhibiting and proapoptotic effects of temozolomide on glioblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):11470. PMC: 6068118. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29929-y. View