» Articles » PMID: 33758959

Retropulsion Force in Laser Lithotripsy-an in Vitro Study Comparing a Holmium Device to a Novel Pulsed Solid-state Thulium Laser

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2021 Mar 24
PMID 33758959
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate retropulsion forces generated by two laser lithotripsy devices, a standard Ho:YAG and a new pulsed solid-state Thulium laser device.

Materials And Methods: Two different Dornier laser devices were assessed: a Medilas H Solvo 35 and a pulsed solid-state Thulium laser evaluation model (Dornier MedTech Laser GmbH, Wessling, Germany). We used a 37 °C water bath; temperature was monitored with a thermocouple/data-logger. Representative sets of settings were examined for both devices, including short and long pulse lengths where applicable. For each setting, ten force values were recorded by a low-force precision piezo sensor whereby the laser fibre was either brought into contact with the sensor or placed at a 3 mm distance.

Results: The mean retropulsion forces resulting from the new Tm:YAG device were significantly lower than those of the Ho:YAG device under all pulse energy and frequency settings, ranging between 0.92 and 19.60 N for Thulium and 8.09-39.67 N for Holmium. The contact setups yielded lower forces than the distance setups. The forces increased with increasing pulse energy settings while shorter pulse lengths led to 12-44% higher retropulsive force in the 2.0 J/5 Hz comparisons.

Conclusion: The Tm:YAG device not only significantly generated lower retropulsion forces in all comparisons to Holmium at corresponding settings but also offers adjustment options to achieve lower energy pulses and longer pulse durations to produce even lower retropulsion. These advantages are a promising add-on to laser lithotripsy procedures and may be highly relevant for improving laser lithotripsy performance.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in lithotripsy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen R, Song Y, Liu Y, Li J, Qin C, Xu T Urolithiasis. 2025; 53(1):33.

PMID: 39954083 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01709-0.


Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy with the Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser Thulio: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study.

Proietti S, Marchioni M, Oo M, Scalia R, Gisone S, Monroy R Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 67:77-83.

PMID: 39286758 PMC: 11403138. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.114.


Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review.

Chicaud M, Corrales M, Kutchukian S, Solano C, Candela L, Doizi S World J Urol. 2023; 41(12):3437-3447.

PMID: 37932561 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04679-3.


Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review.

Kronenberg P, Cerrato C, Juliebo-Jones P, Herrmann T, Tokas T, Somani B World J Urol. 2023; 41(12):3817-3827.

PMID: 37906263 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04669-5.


Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).

Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Petov V, Morozov A, Ali S, Babaevskaya D World J Urol. 2023; 41(12):3705-3711.

PMID: 37855897 PMC: 10693522. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04651-1.


References
1.
Lee H, Box G, Abraham J, Deane L, Elchico E, Eisner B . In vitro evaluation of nitinol urological retrieval coil and ureteral occlusion device: retropulsion and holmium laser fragmentation efficiency. J Urol. 2008; 180(3):969-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.016. View

2.
Eisel M, Strobl S, Pongratz T, Strittmatter F, Sroka R . In vitro investigations of propulsion during laser lithotripsy using video tracking. Lasers Surg Med. 2017; 50(4):333-339. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22770. View

3.
Elashry O, Tawfik A . Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2012; 9(12):691-8. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.204. View

4.
Zhang J, Rutherford J, Solomon M, Cheng B, Xuan J, Gong J . Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter. J Healthc Eng. 2018; 2018:8261801. PMC: 5863310. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8261801. View

5.
Kang H, Lee H, Teichman J, Oh J, Kim J, Welch A . Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 2006; 38(8):762-72. DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20376. View