» Articles » PMID: 33758499

Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence and Safety Evaluation of Two Ticagrelor Tablets Under Fasting and Fed Conditions in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Mar 24
PMID 33758499
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence and safety profiles of test drug and reference drug of 90 mg ticagrelor tablets and their main active metabolite AR-C124910XX under fasting and fed conditions.

Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence, and two-treatment crossover study. Subjects were randomized and evenly administered with a single dose of test drug or reference drug of 90 mg ticagrelor tablets orally under fasting or fed conditions with a 7-day washout period. The primary PK parameters were calculated with non-compartmental model, including peak concentration (C), area under the curve (AUC) from zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC), and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC). Bioequivalence was judged by whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the test/reference drugs were within the predefined range of 80-125%. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed as safety endpoints.

Results: Eighty healthy Chinese subjects (fasting condition: n=40; fed condition: n=40) were enrolled, but two withdrew for personal reasons. As for PK parameters, there was no statistical difference (P>0.05) between the test and reference drugs under both conditions. As for bioequivalence, the 90% CIs of GMR for C AUC and AUC all fell within 80%-125% regardless of food intake or not. No severe adverse events were observed in the study. Chinese clinical trial registration number is ChiCTR1800015091 (http://www.chictr.org.cn).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the test drug and the reference drug of ticagrelor tablets were bioequivalent. The PK and safety profiles were also similar regardless of food intake or not in healthy Chinese subjects.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Virtual Bioequivalence: A Systematic Review of Computational Methods and Regulatory Perspectives in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Alotaiq N, Dermawan D Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39598538 PMC: 11597508. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16111414.


Key Factors for Improving Predictive Accuracy and Avoiding Overparameterization of the PBPK Absorption Model in Food Effect Studies of Weakly Basic Water-Insoluble Compounds in Immediate Release Formulations.

Zhang M, Zhang S, Wang L, Zhang Z, Hu Q, Liu D Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 39458653 PMC: 11511194. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16101324.


The effect of gene polymorphism on ticagrelor metabolism: an study of 22 CYP3A4 variants in Chinese Han population.

Hu X, Wang P, Zeng D, Hu G PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18109.

PMID: 39346054 PMC: 11430164. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18109.


Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of a Generic Ticagrelor 90-mg Formulation Versus the Innovator Product in Healthy White Subjects Under Fasting Conditions.

Rizea-Savu S, Duna S, Ghita A, Iordachescu A, Garlea I, Chirila M Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2024; 14(1):59-64.

PMID: 39256193 PMC: 11701948. DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.1471.


Effect of Polymorphisms on Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Nie S, Chen K, Guo C, Pei Q, Zou C, Yao L Front Pharmacol. 2022; 12:797278.

PMID: 35280252 PMC: 8915292. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.797278.

References
1.
Wallentin L, Becker R, Budaj A, Cannon C, Emanuelsson H, Held C . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11):1045-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904327. View

2.
Teng R, Mitchell P, Butler K . Effect of age and gender on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single ticagrelor dose in healthy individuals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 68(8):1175-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1227-4. View

3.
Hiasa Y, Teng R, Emanuelsson H . Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of ticagrelor in Asian patients with stable coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014; 29(4):324-33. DOI: 10.1007/s12928-014-0277-1. View

4.
Smith J, Negrelli J, Manek M, Hawes E, Viera A . Diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome: an evidence-based update. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015; 28(2):283-93. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.02.140189. View

5.
Tersalvi G, Biasco L, Cioffi G, Pedrazzini G . Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, and Bleeding: A Clinical Perspective. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7). PMC: 7408729. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072064. View