» Articles » PMID: 33753767

No Difference of Survival Between Cruciate Retaining and Substitution Designs in High Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Mar 23
PMID 33753767
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term implant survival and outcomes in patients with high-flexion cruciate-retaining (CR) or high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting (PS) knee implants. A total of 253 knees (CR group: 159 vs. PS group: 94) were available for examination over a mean follow-up of 10 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed including the Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at the final follow-up. Radiologic measurements were also assessed including the hip-knee-ankle angle and radiolucent lines according to the KSS system at the final follow-up. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. At the final follow-up, the mean total HSS scores were similar between the two groups (p = 0.970). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was similar between groups (p = 0.601). The 10- and 15-year survival rates were 95.4% and 93.3% in the CR group and 92.7% and 90.9% in the PS group, respectively, with no significant difference. Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both the high-flexion CR and high-flexion PS total knee designs without a difference in survival rate after a 10-year follow-up.

Citing Articles

Correlation of revision rate of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical studies and worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Obermayr S, Klasan A, Rasic L, Hauer G, Leitner L, Leithner A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4873-4886.

PMID: 39404769 PMC: 11582169. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05574-1.


Osseointegration reduces aseptic loosening of primary distal femoral implants in pediatric and adolescent osteosarcoma patients: a retrospective clinical and radiographic study.

Welsh C, Hull P, Meckmongkol T, Mumith A, Lovejoy J, Giangarra C Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(8):3585-3596.

PMID: 37246989 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03590-2.


Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kanna R, Murali S, Ramanathan A, Pereira L, Yadav C, Anand S J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):19.

PMID: 36800047 PMC: 9938095. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00583-2.


Comparison of traditional PS versus kinematically designs in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Shichman I, Oakley C, Thomas J, Fernandez-Madrid I, Meftah M, Schwarzkopf R Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(8):5293-5301.

PMID: 36625899 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04763-8.

References
1.
Lee W, Song E, Choi S, Jin Q, Seon J . Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 35(3):752-755. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.008. View

2.
Wang C, Wang J, Chen H . Comparing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study. Chang Gung Med J. 2004; 27(8):578-85. View

3.
Argenson J, Scuderi G, Komistek R, Scott W, Kelly M, Aubaniac J . In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2004; 38(2):277-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.027. View

4.
Bin S, Nam T . Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 15(4):350-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0202-y. View

5.
Noble P, Conditt M, Cook K, Mathis K . The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452:35-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e. View