Cognitive Profiles in Older Males and Females

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2021 Mar 23

PMID 33753754

Citations 9

Authors

C Jockwitz

L Wiersch

J Stumme

S Caspers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Males and females are subject to differences in cognitive processing strategies, i.e. the way males and females solve cognitive tasks. So far primarily reported for younger adults, this seems to be especially important in older adults, who also show sex differences in cognitive impairments. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to examine the older adult population with respect to cognitive profiles derived from a large variety of cognitive functions. Using an exploratory component analysis with consecutive confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 676 older adults, neuropsychological performance data in a variety of cognitive domains was decomposed into cognitive components. A general cognitive profile based on the whole group fits unequally well on the two sexes. Importantly, cognitive profiles based on either males or females differ in terms of their composition of cognitive components, i.e. three components in males versus four components in females, with a generally better model fit in females. Thus, related to the established differences in processing styles between males and females the current study found a rather decomposed (or local) cognitive profile in females while males seem to show a holistic (or global) cognitive profile, with more interrelations between different cognitive functions.

Citing Articles

Biological sex, microglial signaling pathways, and radiation exposure shape cortical proteomic profiles and behavior in mice.

Strohm A, Oldfield S, Hernady E, Johnston C, Marples B, OBanion M Brain Behav Immun Health. 2024; 43():100911.

PMID: 39677060 PMC: 11634995. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100911.

The effectiveness of emotion-oriented approaches on psychological outcomes and cognitive function in older adults: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Lin C, Chen R, Kustanti C, Chu H, Lee C, Banda K J Glob Health. 2024; 14:04123.

PMID: 38939961 PMC: 11211973. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.04123.

Differential predictability of cognitive profiles from brain structure in older males and females.

Jockwitz C, Kramer C, Dellani P, Caspers S Geroscience. 2023; 46(2):1713-1730.

PMID: 37730943 PMC: 10828131. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-023-00934-y.

Intensive assessment of executive functions derived from performance in cognitive training games.

Soldevila-Domenech N, De Toma I, Forcano L, Diaz-Pellicer P, Cuenca-Royo A, Fagundo B iScience. 2023; 26(6):106886.

PMID: 37260752 PMC: 10227423. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106886.

The limitations of large-scale volunteer databases to address inequalities and global challenges in health and aging.

Brayne C, Moffitt T Nat Aging. 2023; 2(9):775-783.

PMID: 37118500 PMC: 10154032. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-022-00277-x.

References

Fournet N, Roulin J, Monnier C, Atzeni T, Cosnefroy O, Le Gall D . Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and structural invariance with age of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)--French version. Child Neuropsychol. 2014; 21(3):379-98. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2014.906569. View

Schmermund A, Mohlenkamp S, Stang A, Gronemeyer D, Seibel R, Hirche H . Assessment of clinically silent atherosclerotic disease and established and novel risk factors for predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac death in healthy middle-aged subjects: rationale and design of the Heinz Nixdorf RECALL Study. Risk.... Am Heart J. 2002; 144(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123579. View

Bonsang E, Skirbekk V, Staudinger U . As You Sow, So Shall You Reap: Gender-Role Attitudes and Late-Life Cognition. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(9):1201-1213. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617708634. View

de Frias C, Nilsson L, Herlitz A . Sex differences in cognition are stable over a 10-year period in adulthood and old age. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2006; 13(3-4):574-87. DOI: 10.1080/13825580600678418. View

Mitchell M, Miller L . Prediction of functional status in older adults: the ecological validity of four Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System tests. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008; 30(6):683-90. DOI: 10.1080/13803390701679893. View

Hyde J . The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol. 2005; 60(6):581-592. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581. View

Scheuringer A, Pletzer B . Sex differences in the Kimchi-Palmer task revisited: Global reaction times, but not number of global choices differ between adult men and women. Physiol Behav. 2016; 165:159-65. PMC: 7115960. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.07.012. View

Pletzer B, Scheuringer A, Scherndl T . Global-local processing relates to spatial and verbal processing: implications for sex differences in cognition. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):10575. PMC: 5585266. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11013-6. View

Weiss E, Ragland J, Brensinger C, Bilker W, Deisenhammer E, Delazer M . Sex differences in clustering and switching in verbal fluency tasks. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006; 12(4):502-9. DOI: 10.1017/s1355617706060656. View

10.

Morris J, HEYMAN A, Mohs R, Hughes J, van Belle G, Fillenbaum G . The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1989; 39(9):1159-65. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.39.9.1159. View

11.

Harvey P . Domains of cognition and their assessment . Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019; 21(3):227-237. PMC: 6829170. DOI: 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/pharvey. View

12.

Scheuringer A, Wittig R, Pletzer B . Sex differences in verbal fluency: the role of strategies and instructions. Cogn Process. 2017; 18(4):407-417. PMC: 5688186. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0801-1. View

13.

Andersen N, Dahmani L, Konishi K, Bohbot V . Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011; 97(1):81-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.09.007. View

14.

Kimchi R, Amishav R, Sulitzeanu-Kenan A . Gender differences in global-local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 130(1):64-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.10.002. View

15.

Pletzer B . Sex-specific strategy use and global-local processing: a perspective toward integrating sex differences in cognition. Front Neurosci. 2015; 8:425. PMC: 4273628. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00425. View

16.

Wilhalme H, Goukasian N, De Leon F, He A, Hwang K, Woo E . A comparison of theoretical and statistically derived indices for predicting cognitive decline. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017; 6:171-181. PMC: 5328960. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.10.002. View

17.

Habib R, Nyberg L, Nilsson L . Cognitive and non-cognitive factors contributing to the longitudinal identification of successful older adults in the betula study. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2007; 14(3):257-73. DOI: 10.1080/13825580600582412. View

18.

Siedlecki K, Falzarano F, Salthouse T . Examining Gender Differences in Neurocognitive Functioning Across Adulthood. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019; 25(10):1051-1060. PMC: 7331091. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617719000821. View

19.

Maitland S, Herlitz A, Nyberg L, Backman L, Nilsson L . Selective sex differences in declarative memory. Mem Cognit. 2005; 32(7):1160-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196889. View

20.

Halpern D, Benbow C, Geary D, Gur R, Hyde J, Gernsbacher M . The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014; 8(1):1-51. PMC: 4270278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x. View