Reaching Out for Food: How Food Incentives Modulate Peripersonal Space Perception

Overview

Journal J Cogn

Publisher Ubiquity Press

Specialty Psychology

Date 2021 Mar 22

PMID 33748666

Authors

Matias Bertonatti

Mathias Weymar

Werner Sommer

Martin H Fischer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine, first, whether food items influence participants' estimations of the size of their subjective peripersonal space. It was of particular interest whether this representation is influenced by satiated/hungry states and is differentially affected by valence and calorie content of depicted stimuli. Second, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used, in order to obtain information about the time course of the observed effects and how they depend on the spatial location of the food pictures. For that purpose, participants had to decide whether food items shown at various distances along a horizontal plane in front of them, were reachable or not. In Experiment 1, when participants were hungry, they perceived an increase of their peripersonal space modulated by high-calorie items which were experienced as being more reachable than low-calorie items. In Experiment 2, the reachability findings were replicated and early and late components of ERPs showed an attentional enhancement in far space for food items when participants were hungry. These findings suggest that participants' subjective peripersonal space increased while being hungry, especially for high-calorie contents. Attention also seems to be oriented more strongly to far space items due to their expected incentive-related salience, expanding the subjective representation of peripersonal space.

References

Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V . The space around us. Science. 1997; 277(5323):190-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5323.190. View

Mangun G . Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology. 1995; 32(1):4-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03400.x. View

Ohla K, Toepel U, le Coutre J, Hudry J . Visual-gustatory interaction: orbitofrontal and insular cortices mediate the effect of high-calorie visual food cues on taste pleasantness. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e32434. PMC: 3303800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032434. View

Nijs I, Muris P, Euser A, Franken I . Differences in attention to food and food intake between overweight/obese and normal-weight females under conditions of hunger and satiety. Appetite. 2009; 54(2):243-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.11.004. View

Goldfield G, Epstein L . Can fruits and vegetables and activities substitute for snack foods?. Health Psychol. 2002; 21(3):299-303. View

Tanner D, Morgan-Short K, Luck S . How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology. 2015; 52(8):997-1009. PMC: 4506207. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12437. View

Gigliotti M, Soares Coelho P, Coutinho J, Coello Y . Peripersonal space in social context is modulated by action reward, but differently in males and females. Psychol Res. 2019; 85(1):181-194. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x. View

Coello Y, Richaud S, Magne P, Rossetti Y . Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: a dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimensions. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41(5):622-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00200-2. View

Piech R, Lewis J, Parkinson C, Owen A, Roberts A, Downing P . Neural correlates of appetite and hunger-related evaluative judgments. PLoS One. 2009; 4(8):e6581. PMC: 2719810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006581. View

10.

Vicario C, Kuran K, Urgesi C . Does hunger sharpen senses? A psychophysics investigation on the effects of appetite in the timing of reinforcement-oriented actions. Psychol Res. 2017; 83(3):395-405. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0934-y. View

11.

Pegna A, Petit L, Khateb A, Annoni J, Sztajzel R, Landis T . So near yet so far: neglect in far or near space depends on tool use. Ann Neurol. 2002; 50(6):820-2. DOI: 10.1002/ana.10058. View

12.

Kringelbach M . Food for thought: hedonic experience beyond homeostasis in the human brain. Neuroscience. 2004; 126(4):807-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.04.035. View

13.

Schupp H, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghofer M . Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Prog Brain Res. 2006; 156:31-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9. View

14.

Postman L, BRUNER J . The reliability of constant errors in psychophysical measurement. J Psychol. 2010; 21:293-9. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917288. View

15.

Fischer M . Action simulation for others is not constrained by one's own postures. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 43(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.003. View

16.

Wang L, Gillis-Smith S, Peng Y, Zhang J, Chen X, Salzman C . The coding of valence and identity in the mammalian taste system. Nature. 2018; 558(7708):127-131. PMC: 6201270. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0165-4. View

17.

Guitart-Masip M, Duzel E, Dolan R, Dayan P . Action versus valence in decision making. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(4):194-202. PMC: 3989998. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.003. View

18.

Weymar M, Schwabe L, Low A, Hamm A . Stress sensitizes the brain: increased processing of unpleasant pictures after exposure to acute stress. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 24(7):1511-8. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00174. View

19.

Stockburger J, Schmalzle R, Flaisch T, Bublatzky F, Schupp H . The impact of hunger on food cue processing: an event-related brain potential study. Neuroimage. 2009; 47(4):1819-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.071. View

20.

Anselme P, Gunturkun O . How foraging works: Uncertainty magnifies food-seeking motivation. Behav Brain Sci. 2018; 42:e35. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000948. View