» Articles » PMID: 33746790

Treatment Response Prediction and Individualized Identification of Short-Term Abstinence Methamphetamine Dependence Using Brain Graph Metrics

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Mar 22
PMID 33746790
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The abuse of methamphetamine (MA) worldwide has gained international attention as the most rapidly growing illicit drug problem. The classification and treatment response prediction of MA addicts are thereby paramount, in order for effective treatments to be more targeted to individuals. However, there has been limited progress. In the present study, 43 MA-dependent participants and 38 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were enrolled, and their resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected. MA-dependent participants who showed 50% reduction in craving were defined as responders to treatment. The present study used the machine learning method, which is a support vector machine (SVM), to detect the most relevant features for discriminating and predicting the treatment response for MA-dependent participants based on the features extracted from the functional graph metrics. A classifier was able to differentiate MA-dependent subjects from normal controls, with a cross-validated prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 73.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 71.23-74.17%), 66.05% (95% CI = 63.06-69.04%), and 80.35% (95% CI = 77.77-82.93%), respectively, at the individual level. The most accurate combination of classifier features included the nodal efficiency in the right middle temporal gyrus and the community index in the left precentral gyrus and cuneus. Between these two, the community index in the left precentral gyrus had the highest importance. In addition, the classification performance of the other classifier used to predict the treatment response of MA-dependent subjects had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 71.2% (95% CI = 69.28-73.12%), 86.75% (95% CI = 84.48-88.92%), and 55.65% (95% CI = 52.61-58.79%), respectively, at the individual level. Furthermore, the most accurate combination of classifier features included the nodal clustering coefficient in the right orbital part of the superior frontal gyrus, the nodal local efficiency in the right orbital part of the superior frontal gyrus, and the right triangular part of the inferior frontal gyrus and right temporal pole of middle temporal gyrus. Among these, the nodal local efficiency in the right temporal pole of the middle temporal gyrus had the highest feature importance. The present study identified the most relevant features of MA addiction and treatment based on SVMs and the features extracted from the graph metrics and provided possible biomarkers to differentiate and predict the treatment response for MA-dependent patients. The brain regions involved in the best combinations should be given close attention during the treatment of MA.

Citing Articles

Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction.

Ekhtiari H, Sangchooli A, Carmichael O, Moeller F, ODonnell P, Oquendo M medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39281741 PMC: 11398440. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.02.24312084.


An electroencephalographic signature predicts craving for methamphetamine.

Tian W, Zhao D, Ding J, Zhan S, Zhang Y, Etkin A Cell Rep Med. 2023; 5(1):101347.

PMID: 38151021 PMC: 10829728. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101347.


The gut microbiota as a potential biomarker for methamphetamine use disorder: evidence from two independent datasets.

Liu L, Deng Z, Liu W, Liu R, Ma T, Zhou Y Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1257073.

PMID: 37790913 PMC: 10543748. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1257073.


Abnormal resting-state functional connectome in methamphetamine-dependent patients and its application in machine-learning-based classification.

Li Y, Cheng P, Liang L, Dong H, Liu H, Shen W Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:1014539.

PMID: 36466158 PMC: 9713007. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1014539.


A brainnetome atlas-based methamphetamine dependence identification using neighborhood component analysis and machine learning on functional MRI data.

Zhou Y, Tang J, Sun Y, Yang W, Ma Y, Wu Q Front Cell Neurosci. 2022; 16:958437.

PMID: 36238830 PMC: 9550874. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.958437.

References
1.
Van Hedger K, Keedy S, Mayo L, Heilig M, de Wit H . Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018; 43(8):1732-1737. PMC: 6006246. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-017-0005-5. View

2.
Ma J, Johnson B, Yu E, Weiss D, McSherry F, Saadvandi J . Fine-grain analysis of the treatment effect of topiramate on methamphetamine addiction with latent variable analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 130(1-3):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.10.009. View

3.
Stewart J, May A, Poppa T, Davenport P, Tapert S, Paulus M . You are the danger: attenuated insula response in methamphetamine users during aversive interoceptive decision-making. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 142:110-9. PMC: 4127120. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.003. View

4.
Siefried K, Acheson L, Lintzeris N, Ezard N . Pharmacological Treatment of Methamphetamine/Amphetamine Dependence: A Systematic Review. CNS Drugs. 2020; 34(4):337-365. PMC: 7125061. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-020-00711-x. View

5.
Zhang Y, Li M, Wang R, Bi Y, Li Y, Yi Z . Abnormal brain white matter network in young smokers: a graph theory analysis study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 12(2):345-356. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-017-9699-6. View