» Articles » PMID: 33745310

Gravettian Hand Stencils As Sign Language Formatives

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Mar 22
PMID 33745310
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several Upper Palaeolithic archaeological sites from the Gravettian period display hand stencils with missing fingers. On the basis of the stencils that Leroi-Gourhan identified in the cave of Gargas (France) in the late 1960s, we explore the hypothesis that those stencils represent hand signs with deliberate folding of fingers, intentionally projected as a negative figure onto the wall. Through a study of the biomechanics of handshapes, we analyse the articulatory effort required for producing the handshapes under the stencils in the Gargas cave, and show that only handshapes that are articulable in the air can be found among the existing stencils. In other words, handshape configurations that would have required using the cave wall as a support for the fingers are not attested. We argue that the stencils correspond to the type of handshape that one ordinarily finds in sign language phonology. More concretely, we claim that they correspond to signs of an 'alternate' or 'non-primary' sign language, like those still employed by a number of bimodal (speaking and signing) human groups in hunter-gatherer populations, like the Australian first nations or the Plains Indians. In those groups, signing is used for hunting and for a rich array of ritual purposes, including mourning and traditional story-telling. We discuss further evidence, based on typological generalizations about the phonology of non-primary sign languages and comparative ethnographic work, that points to such a parallelism. This evidence includes the fact that for some of those groups, stencil and petroglyph art has independently been linked to their sign language expressions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Reconstructing prehistoric languages'.

Citing Articles

A global cross-cultural analysis of string figures reveals evidence of deep transmission and innovation.

Kaaronen R, Walsh M, Henrich A, Wisher I, Miu E, Manninen M J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(221):20240673.

PMID: 39626748 PMC: 11614528. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0673.


Evolution of Consciousness.

Georgiev D Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38255663 PMC: 10817314. DOI: 10.3390/life14010048.


What made us "hunter-gatherers of words".

Boeckx C Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1080861.

PMID: 36845441 PMC: 9947416. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1080861.


Reconstructing prehistoric languages.

Benitez-Burraco A, Progovac L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021; 376(1824):20200187.

PMID: 33745317 PMC: 8059573. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0187.

References
1.
Janssens P . Medical views on prehistoric representations of human hands. Med Hist. 1957; 1(4):318-22. PMC: 1034309. DOI: 10.1017/s0025727300021499. View

2.
Goldin-Meadow S, Brentari D . Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behav Brain Sci. 2015; 40:e46. PMC: 4821822. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15001247. View

3.
Schembri A, Jones C, Burnham D . Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005; 10(3):272-90. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/eni029. View

4.
Hooper A . Further information on the prehistoric representations of human hands in the cave of Gargas. Med Hist. 1980; 24(2):214-6. PMC: 1082706. DOI: 10.1017/s0025727300040187. View

5.
Wildgoose M, Hadingham E, Hooper A . The prehistoric hand pictures at Gargas: attempts at simulation. Med Hist. 1982; 26(2):205-7. PMC: 1139155. DOI: 10.1017/s0025727300041193. View