» Articles » PMID: 33743605

Very-low-dose Aspirin and Surveillance Colonoscopy is Cost-effective in Secondary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals with Advanced Adenomas: Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 Mar 21
PMID 33743605
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Individuals with advanced colorectal adenomas (ACAs) are at high risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), and it is unclear which chemopreventive agent (CPA) is safe and cost-effective for secondary prevention. We aimed to determine, firstly, the most suitable CPA using network meta-analysis (NMA) and secondly, cost-effectiveness of CPA with or without surveillance colonoscopy (SC).

Methods: Systematic review and NMA of randomised controlled trials were performed, and the most suitable CPA was chosen based on efficacy and the most favourable risk-benefit profile. The economic benefits of CPA alone, 3 yearly SC alone, and a combination of CPA and SC were determined using the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in the Malaysian health-care perspective. Outcomes were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2018 US Dollars ($) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and life-years (LYs) gained.

Results: According to NMA, the risk-benefit profile favours the use of aspirin at very-low-dose (ASAVLD, ≤ 100 mg/day) for secondary prevention in individuals with previous ACAs. Celecoxib is the most effective CPA but the cardiovascular adverse events are of concern. According to CEA, the combination strategy (ASAVLD with 3-yearly SC) was cost-saving and dominates its competitors as the best buy option. The probability of being cost-effective for ASAVLD alone, 3-yearly SC alone, and combination strategy were 22%, 26%, and 53%, respectively. Extending the SC interval to five years in combination strategy was more cost-effective when compared to 3-yearly SC alone (ICER of $484/LY gain and $1875/QALY). However, extending to ten years in combination strategy was not cost-effective.

Conclusion: ASAVLD combined with 3-yearly SC in individuals with ACAs may be a cost-effective strategy for CRC prevention. An extension of SC intervals to five years can be considered in resource-limited countries.

Citing Articles

Cost-Utility Analysis of Berberine Chemoprevention for Colorectal Cancer After Polypectomy.

Yuan S, Zhang T, Wu Y, Lu Y, Chang F, Zhu Y Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e61030.

PMID: 38915970 PMC: 11194466. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61030.


Oral aspirin for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hoang K, Chen J, Huang T, Kang Y, Chen C PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0279784.

PMID: 38483854 PMC: 10939266. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279784.


Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Is Cost-Effective for Crohn's Disease Strictures.

Lee K, Lim F, Faye A, Shen B, Hur C Dig Dis Sci. 2022; 67(12):5462-5471.

PMID: 35290570 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07420-z.

References
1.
Veettil S, Teerawattanapong N, Ching S, Lim K, Saokaew S, Phisalprapa P . Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Onco Targets Ther. 2017; 10():2689-2700. PMC: 5449107. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S127335. View

2.
Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Stock C, Hoffmeister M . Natural history of colorectal adenomas: birth cohort analysis among 3.6 million participants of screening colonoscopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22(6):1043-51. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0162. View

3.
Short M, Layton M, Teer B, Domagalski J . Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Am Fam Physician. 2015; 91(2):93-100. View

4.
Logan R, Grainge M, Shepherd V, Armitage N, Muir K . Aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2007; 134(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.014. View

5.
Lieberman D, Rex D, Winawer S, Giardiello F, Johnson D, Levin T . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(3):844-857. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. View