» Articles » PMID: 33735487

Impact of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Older Patients with Comorbidities and Estrogen Receptor-positive, Node-negative Breast Cancer-A National Cancer Database Analysis

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Mar 18
PMID 33735487
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data are lacking about the benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in older patients with multiple comorbidities. The authors sought to determine the effect of ET on the survival of older patients who had multiple comorbidities and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, pathologic node-negative (pN0) breast cancer.

Methods: Women aged ≥70 years in the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) with Charlson/Deyo comorbidity scores of 2 or 3 who had pathologic tumor (pT1)-pT3/pN0, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer were divided into 2 cohorts: adjuvant ET and no ET. Propensity scores were used to match patients based on age, comorbidity score, facility type, pT classification, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the effect of ET on overall survival (OS).

Results: In the nonmatched cohort (n = 3716), 72.8% of patients received ET (n = 2705), and 27.2% did not (n = 1011). The patients who received ET were younger (mean age, 76 vs 79 years; P < .001) and had higher rates of breast conservation compared with those who did not receive ET (lumpectomy plus radiation: 43.4% vs 23.8%, respectively; P < .001). In the matched cohort (n = 1972), the median OS was higher in the ET group (79.2 vs 67.7 months; P < .0001). In the adjusted analysis, ET was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83).

Conclusions: In older patients who have pN0, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with comorbidities, adjuvant ET was associated with improved OS, which may have been overestimated given the confounders inherent in observational studies. To optimize outcomes in these patients, current standard recommendations should be considered stage-for-stage based on life expectancy and the level of tolerance to treatment.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies in older patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data.

Chen Y, Lai H, Su H, Loh E, Huang T, Tam K Breast Cancer. 2024; 31(5):739-753.

PMID: 39085679 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01622-1.


Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review.

Sanchez D, Derks M, Verstijnen J, Menges D, Portielje J, van den Bos F BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):563.

PMID: 38937703 PMC: 11212278. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05152-5.


Favorable outcome of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment than surgery-first in female HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients-A NCDB analysis (2010-2016).

Xu P, Luo W, Hu J, Ma X, Hao Q, Hui W Cancer Med. 2024; 13(11):e7244.

PMID: 38859692 PMC: 11165171. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7244.

References
1.
LeMasters T, Madhavan S, Sambamoorthi U, Hazard-Jenkins H, M Kelly K, Long D . Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care Among Older Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16(6):703-710. PMC: 6091512. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7004. View

2.
Nabieva N, Kellner S, Fehm T, Haberle L, de Waal J, Rezai M . Influence of patient and tumor characteristics on early therapy persistence with letrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: results of the prospective Evaluate-TM study with 3941 patients. Ann Oncol. 2017; 29(1):186-192. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx630. View

3.
Hind D, Wyld L, Reed M . Surgery, with or without tamoxifen, vs tamoxifen alone for older women with operable breast cancer: cochrane review. Br J Cancer. 2007; 96(7):1025-9. PMC: 2360121. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603600. View

4.
DAgostino Jr R . Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998; 17(19):2265-81. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b. View

5.
Austin P . A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2007; 27(12):2037-49. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3150. View