Prospective Cohort Study of Voice Outcomes Following Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture in Gastric Pull-up Reconstruction After Total Laryngopharyngoesophagectomy

Overview

Journal J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties General Surgery
Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2021 Mar 18

PMID 33731216

Authors

Emily C Deane

Harman Parhar

Linda Rammage

Amanda Hu

Donald W Anderson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Gastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following gastric pull-up and to analyze voice outcomes.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancies who underwent gastric pull-up and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture between 1988 and 2017 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Objective acoustic measures included fundamental frequency and vocal intensity. Perceptual analysis was performed using voice recordings ("Rainbow Passage") randomly presented in a blinded fashion to four clinicians using the validated GRBAS scale. Speech intelligibility was assessed in a blinded fashion using a validated 7-point scale. Additionally, the Voice Handicap Index-10 was administered as a validated patient self-reporting tool.

Results: Ten patients (7 male, 3 female) were included, all of whom preferentially used tracheoesophageal puncture for communication. These patients had abnormal median fundamental frequency of 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 214-265) Hz and a limited median vocal intensity of 65.8 (IQR 64.1-68.3) dB. Perceptual analysis (GRBAS) revealed a median 'moderate' degree of impairment [grade 2 (IQR 2-3), roughness 2 (IQR 2-3), breathiness 3 (IQR 2-3), asthenia 2 (IQR 1-2), strain 2 (IQR 1-2)] as did median intelligibility scores [median 5 (IQR 4-7)]. Most patients self-reported an abnormal voice handicap-10 [median 26.5 (IQR 22.8-35.0)].

Conclusion: Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture is a safe and feasible option for voice rehabilitation after gastric pull-up. Although analyses demonstrated moderate subjective and objective impairment, tracheoesophageal puncture provided patients with a self-reported means of functional verbal communication and was their preferred method of communication.

References

Noel D, Fink D, Kunduk M, Schexnaildre M, DiLeo M, McWhorter A . Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture using transnasal esophagoscopy in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy. Head Neck. 2015; 38(3):E61-3. DOI: 10.1002/hed.24154. View

Rosen C, Lee A, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T . Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114(9):1549-56. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009. View

Butskiy O, Rahmanian R, White R, Durham S, Anderson D, Prisman E . Revisiting the gastric pull-up for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality and morbidity. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114(8):907-914. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24477. View

Eadie T . The ICF: a proposed framework for comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals who use alaryngeal speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003; 12(2):189-97. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/065). View

van Sluis K, van der Molen L, van Son R, Hilgers F, Bhairosing P, van den Brekel M . Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 275(1):11-26. PMC: 5754416. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4790-6. View

Robbins J, Fisher H, Blom E, SINGER M . A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. J Speech Hear Disord. 1984; 49(2):202-10. DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4902.202. View

Jacobi I, Timmermans A, Hilgers F, van den Brekel M . Voice quality and surgical detail in post-laryngectomy tracheoesophageal speakers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 273(9):2669-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3777-4. View

Schuster M, Rosanowski F, Schwarz R, Eysholdt U, Lohscheller J . Quantitative detection of substitute voice generator during phonation in patients undergoing laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 131(11):945-52. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.11.945. View

Bleach N, Perry A, Cheesman A . Surgical voice restoration with the Blom-Singer prosthesis following laryngopharyngoesophagectomy and pharyngogastric anastomosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991; 100(2):142-7. DOI: 10.1177/000348949110000210. View

10.

Kreiman J, Gerratt B, Precoda K, Berke G . Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Hear Res. 1992; 35(3):512-20. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3503.512. View

11.

Deschler D, Herr M, Kmiecik J, Sethi R, Bunting G . Tracheoesophageal voice after total laryngopharyngectomy reconstruction: Jejunum versus radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125(12):2715-21. DOI: 10.1002/lary.25404. View

12.

Jones P, Farrington W, Weighill J . Surgical salvage in postcricoid cancer. J Laryngol Otol. 1986; 100(1):85-95. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100098789. View

13.

Vittinghoff E, McCulloch C . Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 165(6):710-8. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwk052. View

14.

Izdebski K, Ross J, Hetzler D, Fontanesi J, Krumpe P . Speech restoration post-pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy using tracheogastric fistula. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1988; 25(3):33-40. View

15.

Deschler D, Gray S . Tracheoesophageal speech following laryngopharyngectomy and pharyngeal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2004; 37(3):567-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2004.01.006. View

16.

Siric L, Sos D, Rosso M, Stevanovic S . Objective assessment of tracheoesophageal and esophageal speech using acoustic analysis of voice. Coll Antropol. 2013; 36 Suppl 2:111-4. View

17.

Disa J, Pusic A, Mehrara B . Reconstruction of the hypopharynx with the free jejunum transfer. J Surg Oncol. 2006; 94(6):466-70. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20483. View

18.

Moerman M, Martens J, Dejonckere P . Multidimensional assessment of strongly irregular voices such as in substitution voicing and spasmodic dysphonia: a compilation of own research. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014; 40(1):24-9. DOI: 10.3109/14015439.2014.936497. View

19.

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):806-8. PMC: 2034723. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. View

20.

SINGER M, Blom E, Hamaker R . Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. J Otolaryngol. 1983; 12(5):329-34. View