» Articles » PMID: 33730169

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications' Association with Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine: A Retrospective Registry Analysis

Overview
Journal Anesthesiology
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2021 Mar 17
PMID 33730169
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade related to nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents may be associated with pulmonary complications. In this study, the authors sought to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in comparison with neostigmine.

Methods: Adult patients from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent general anesthesia procedures between January 2010 and July 2019 were included in an observational cohort study. In early 2017, a wholesale switch from neostigmine to sugammadex occurred at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The authors therefore identified all patients receiving nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockades and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex. An inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score analysis approach was applied to control for measured confounding. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, determined by retrospective chart review and defined as the composite of the three postoperative respiratory occurrences: pneumonia, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and unplanned intubation.

Results: Of 10,491 eligible cases, 7,800 patients received neostigmine, and 2,691 received sugammadex. A total of 575 (5.5%) patients experienced postoperative pulmonary complications (5.9% neostigmine vs. 4.2% sugammadex). Specifically, 306 (2.9%) patients had pneumonia (3.2% vs. 2.1%), 113 (1.1%) prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.1% vs. 1.1%), and 156 (1.5%) unplanned intubation (1.6% vs. 1.0%). After propensity score adjustment, the authors found a lower absolute incidence rate of postoperative pulmonary complications over time (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [per year]; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.96; P < .001). No difference was observed on the odds of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients receiving sugammadex in comparison with neostigmine (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.22; P = 0.468).

Conclusions: Among 10,491 patients at a single academic tertiary care center, the authors found that switching neuromuscular blockade reversal agents was not associated with the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Editor’s Perspective:

Citing Articles

Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for optimizing video laryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Creutzburg A, Norskov A, Christensen M, Afshari A, Lundstrom L, Bill L Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025; 69(3):e70008.

PMID: 39979231 PMC: 11842299. DOI: 10.1111/aas.70008.


State-of-the-art anesthesia practices: a comprehensive review on optimizing patient safety and recovery.

Fu G, Xu L, Chen H, Lin J BMC Surg. 2025; 25(1):32.

PMID: 39833810 PMC: 11749226. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-025-02763-6.


Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Reversal on Postoperative Recovery Time in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ajetunmobi O, Wong D, Perlas A, Rajaleelan W, Wang S, Huszti E Anesth Analg. 2024; 140(3):568-576.

PMID: 38848257 PMC: 11805487. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007013.


Comparison of Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Postoperative Neuromuscular Blockade Recovery in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases Undergoing Transbronchial Cryobiopsy: A Randomized Trial.

Lu L, Chen X, Li S, Cen Y Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e942773.

PMID: 38689479 PMC: 11071690. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942773.


Neuromuscular block management: evidence-based principles and practice.

Rodney G, Raju P, Brull S BJA Educ. 2024; 24(1):13-22.

PMID: 38495745 PMC: 10941205. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.10.005.


References
1.
Chae Y, Joe H, Oh J, Lee E, Yi I . Thirty-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Sugammadex Use in Colorectal Surgery Patients; Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(1). PMC: 6352235. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010097. View

2.
Hawkins A, Geiger T, King A, Wanderer J, Tiwari V, Muldoon R . An enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery is associated with decreased organ level rates of complications: a difference-in-differences analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018; 33(7):2222-2230. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6508-2. View

3.
Jones R, Caldwell J, Brull S, Soto R . Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008; 109(5):816-24. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee. View

4.
Murphy G, Brull S . Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010; 111(1):120-8. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. View

5.
Alday E, Munoz M, Planas A, Mata E, Alvarez C . Effects of neuromuscular block reversal with sugammadex versus neostigmine on postoperative respiratory outcomes after major abdominal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2019; 66(11):1328-1337. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01419-3. View