Inhibition of Saccade Initiation Improves Saccade Accuracy: The Role of Local and Remote Visual Distractors in the Control of Saccadic Eye Movements

Overview

Journal J Vis

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2021 Mar 17

PMID 33729451

Authors

Eugene McSorley

Alice G Cruickshank

Rachel McCloy

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

When a distractor appears close to the target location, saccades are less accurate. However, the presence of a further distractor, remote from those stimuli, increases the saccade response latency and improves accuracy. Explanations for this are either that the second, remote distractor impacts directly on target selection processes or that the remote distractor merely impairs the ability to initiate a saccade and changes the time at which unaffected target selection processes are accessed. In order to tease these two explanations apart, here we examine the relationship between latency and accuracy of saccades to a target and close distractor pair while a remote distractor appears at variable distance. Accuracy improvements are found to follow a similar pattern, regardless of the presence of the remote distractor, which suggests that the effect of the remote distractor is not the result of a direct impact on the target selection process. Our findings support the proposal that a remote distractor impairs the ability to initiate a saccade, meaning the competition between target and close distractor is accessed at a later time, thus resulting in more accurate saccades.

References

Jantz J, Watanabe M, Everling S, Munoz D . Threshold mechanism for saccade initiation in frontal eye field and superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 109(11):2767-80. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00611.2012. View

White B, Theeuwes J, Munoz D . Interaction between visual- and goal-related neuronal signals on the trajectories of saccadic eye movements. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 24(3):707-17. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00162. View

Coren S, Hoenig P . Effect of non-target stimuli upon length of voluntary saccades. Percept Mot Skills. 1972; 34(2):499-508. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1972.34.2.499. View

Van Opstal A, Van Gisbergen J . A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades. Biol Cybern. 1989; 60(3):171-83. DOI: 10.1007/BF00207285. View

Hafed Z, Goffart L, Krauzlis R . A neural mechanism for microsaccade generation in the primate superior colliculus. Science. 2009; 323(5916):940-3. PMC: 2655118. DOI: 10.1126/science.1166112. View

Findlay J, Brown V . Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning. Vision Res. 2005; 46(1-2):216-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.035. View

Ludwig C, Gilchrist I, McSorley E . The remote distractor effect in saccade programming: channel interactions and lateral inhibition. Vision Res. 2005; 45(9):1177-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.019. View

Bompas A, Sumner P . Saccadic inhibition reveals the timing of automatic and voluntary signals in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(35):12501-12. PMC: 6703251. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2234-11.2011. View

Wilimzig C, Schneider S, Schoner G . The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory. Neural Netw. 2006; 19(8):1059-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003. View

10.

Honda H . The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions. Vision Res. 2005; 45(21):2773-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.06.026. View

11.

McSorley E, McCloy R, Lyne C . The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency. Vision Res. 2012; 60:61-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.007. View

12.

Satel J, Wang Z, Trappenberg T, Klein R . Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus. Vision Res. 2011; 51(9):987-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.013. View

13.

Godijn R, Theeuwes J . Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002; 28(5):1039-54. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1039. View

14.

McSorley E, Cruickshank A . Evidence that indirect inhibition of saccade initiation improves saccade acuracy. Iperception. 2013; 1(2):73-82. PMC: 3563055. DOI: 10.1068/i0388. View

15.

Marino R, Trappenberg T, Dorris M, Munoz D . Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 24(2):315-36. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00139. View

16.

McPeek R, Han J, Keller E . Competition between saccade goals in the superior colliculus produces saccade curvature. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(5):2577-90. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00657.2002. View

17.

Ludwig C, Gilchrist I . Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 152(1):60-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1520-7. View

18.

Veale R, Hafed Z, Yoshida M . How is visual salience computed in the brain? Insights from behaviour, neurobiology and modelling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017; 372(1714). PMC: 5206280. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0113. View

19.

Everling S, Pare M, Dorris M, Munoz D . Comparison of the discharge characteristics of brain stem omnipause neurons and superior colliculus fixation neurons in monkey: implications for control of fixation and saccade behavior. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 79(2):511-28. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.511. View

20.

Walker M, FitzGibbon E, Goldberg M . Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73(5):1988-2003. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.5.1988. View