» Articles » PMID: 33727454

Subjective and Objective Measures of the Patient Experience Before, During, and After Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Mar 17
PMID 33727454
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess patient experience of intravitreal injections using vital-signs, visual-experience, pain-rating and emotional response during intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Methods: A prospective observational study of patient experience of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections done following metrics were collected pre-injection, during injection, and post-injection: pain assessment using visual analog score, fear-response rating, visual-experience questionnaire, and vital-signs.

Results: A total of one-hundred-and-seventy-four patients undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for retinal pathologies were included in the study. Mean age was 58.8 ± 10.4 years in <5 injection group (n = 133) and 59.02 ± 9.0 years in ≥5 injection group (n = 41) (P = 0.90).During injection, 90.2% of patients in <5 injection group reported moderate or severe pain compared to 78% of patients in ≥5 injection group. In pre and post-injection phases, mild-to-moderate pain was reported in both groups (P = <0.001). Ninety-two (52.9%) patients reported having a mild frightening experience. There was no statistical significance in patients assessment of fear with respect to age, sex, or number of injections. The Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) during and following injection ((SBP 171.7 ± 21.1,150.8 ± 16.2) procedures was significantly higher in cases with <5 injections when comparing to cases with >5 injections (SBP 159.7 ± 26.4, 143.2 ± 17.0) (P = 0.003), (P = 0.011). DBP, heart rate, pulse rate measurements were similar among patients in all phases of the study.

Conclusion: We report a large sample size with comprehensive assessments of the patient experience. Higher pain ratings in the <5 injection group, the increase in the SBP in the pre-and during injection phases, and the overall rating of mild-to-moderate fear during the procedure.

Citing Articles

Real-world experience of intravitreal faricimab injection in previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration eyes: a case series.

Bantounou M, Elsheikh M, Ijasan A, Santiago C BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):117.

PMID: 40065260 PMC: 11892307. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-03953-9.


Effect of Needle Gauge Size on Pain During Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Butler E, Bjerager J, Eriksen N, Hajari J, Schneider M, Faber C Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(3):801-817.

PMID: 38265622 PMC: 10853108. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00879-7.


Treatment contentment and preference of patients undergoing intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy.

Kellner U, Bedar M, Weinitz S, Farmand G, Surul E, Weide S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021; 259(12):3649-3654.

PMID: 34296345 PMC: 8298185. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05324-8.

References
1.
Johnson C . Measuring Pain. Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Pain Scale: What is the Difference?. J Chiropr Med. 2009; 4(1):43-4. PMC: 2647033. DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60112-8. View

2.
Pulido J, Zobitz M, An K . Scleral penetration force requirements for commonly used intravitreal needles. Eye (Lond). 2006; 21(9):1210-1. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702577. View

3.
Antcliff R, Marshall J . The pathogenesis of edema in diabetic maculopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2000; 14(4):223-32. DOI: 10.3109/08820539909069541. View

4.
Berger V, Munk M, Lersch F, Wolf S, Ebneter A, Zinkernagel M . Association of Intravitreal Injections With Blood Pressure Increase: The Following Excitement and Anxiety Response Under Intravitreal Injection Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018; 137(1):87-90. PMC: 6439777. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4892. View

5.
Salo D, Eget D, Lavery R, Garner L, Bernstein S, Tandon K . Can patients accurately read a visual analog pain scale?. Am J Emerg Med. 2003; 21(7):515-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2003.08.022. View