Whole Genome and Acid Stress Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum ZDY2013

Overview

Journal Arch Microbiol

Specialty Microbiology

Date 2021 Mar 16

PMID 33725139

Citations 5

Authors

Lingling Peng

Kui Zhao

Shufang Chen

Zhongyue Ren

Hua Wei

Cuixiang Wan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous study has reported that Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZDY2013 which was screened from traditional Chinese fermented soybeans has a strong acid resistance. The purpose of this study was to uncover the genes potentially related to its genetic adaptation and probiotic profiles, based on comparative genomic and comparative transcriptome analysis. We got the basic information about L. plantarum ZDY2013 and identified genes which are related to genetic adaptation and probiotic profiles, including carbohydrate transport and metabolism, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis, proteolytic enzyme systems and amino acid biosynthesis, CRISPR adaptive immunity, stress responses, ability to adhere to the host intestinal wall, exopolysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis, and bacteriocin biosynthesis. Comparative transcriptome showed CK group (normal MRS culture L. plantarum ZDY2013) and SCL group (pH 3.0 MRS culture L. plantarum ZDY2013) had 652 significant differentially expressed genes including 310 up-regulated genes and 342 down-regulated genes. Besides that, these genes had been classified through KEGG and GO functional annotation. In addition, we also found top 20 KEGG pathways adjusted to acid stress. Then, some genes were selected to verify the transcriptome analysis and explore the mechanism of how L. plantarum ZDY2013 tolerate acid stress. We found that some genes of ABC transporter, phosphotransferase system, oxidation reduction process, membrane transporter and phosphorylation metabolism process had a significant change. These results suggested that comparative characterization of the L. plantarum ZDY2013 genome and transcriptome provided the genetic basis for further elucidating the functional mechanisms of it.

Citing Articles

Transcriptional Responses of to TNFα, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 Cytokines.

Klimina K, Dyachkova M, Veselovsky V, Zakharevich N, Strokach A, Selezneva O Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596886 PMC: 11591797. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110931.

The Effects and Toxicity of Different Pyrene Concentrations on Using Transcriptomic Analysis.

Zhu H, Gong L, Wang R, Shao Z Microorganisms. 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38399729 PMC: 10892627. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12020326.

Understanding the Effect of Different Glucose Concentrations in the Oligotrophic Bacterium BS-G1 through Transcriptomics Analysis.

Chen L, Wang C, Su J Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10).

PMID: 37894061 PMC: 10609351. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11102401.

Enrichment Culture but Not Metagenomic Sequencing Identified a Highly Prevalent Phage Infecting in Human Feces.

Zhao X, Sun C, Jin M, Chen J, Xing L, Yan J Microbiol Spectr. 2023; 11(3):e0434022.

PMID: 36995238 PMC: 10269749. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.04340-22.

Genomic and Phylogenetic Analysis of L125, and Evaluation of Its Anti-Proliferative and Cytotoxic Activity in Cancer Cells.

Tegopoulos K, Stergiou O, Kiousi D, Tsifintaris M, Koletsou E, Papageorgiou A Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34829947 PMC: 8615743. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9111718.

References

Anders S, Huber W . Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(10):R106. PMC: 3218662. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106. View

Bang M, Yong C, Ko H, Choi I, Oh S . Transcriptional Response and Enhanced Intestinal Adhesion Ability of GG after Acid Stress. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018; 28(10):1604-1613. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1807.07033. View

Bolotin A, Wincker P, Mauger S, Jaillon O, Malarme K, Weissenbach J . The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 2001; 11(5):731-53. PMC: 311110. DOI: 10.1101/gr.gr-1697r. View

Broadbent J, Larsen R, Deibel V, Steele J . Physiological and transcriptional response of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 to acid stress. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192(9):2445-58. PMC: 2863488. DOI: 10.1128/JB.01618-09. View

Chaillou S, Champomier-Verges M, Cornet M, Crutz-Le Coq A, Dudez A, Martin V . The complete genome sequence of the meat-borne lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus sakei 23K. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23(12):1527-33. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1160. View

Costabile A, Bergillos-Meca T, Rasinkangas P, Korpela K, de Vos W, Gibson G . Effects of Soluble Corn Fiber Alone or in Synbiotic Combination with GG and the Pilus-Deficient Derivative GG-PB12 on Fecal Microbiota, Metabolism, and Markers of Immune Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in.... Front Immunol. 2018; 8:1443. PMC: 5733116. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01443. View

Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma P . How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006; 70(4):939-1031. PMC: 1698508. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00024-06. View

Fortier L, Tourdot-Marechal R, Divies C, Lee B, Guzzo J . Induction of Oenococcus oeni H+-ATPase activity and mRNA transcription under acidic conditions. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003; 222(2):165-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00299-4. View

Fu G, Zhao K, Chen H, Wang Y, Nie L, Wei H . Effect of 3 lactobacilli on immunoregulation and intestinal microbiota in a β-lactoglobulin-induced allergic mouse model. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102(3):1943-1958. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15683. View

10.

Huang R, Tao X, Wan C, Li S, Xu H, Xu F . In vitro probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY 2013 and its modulatory effect on gut microbiota of mice. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98(9):5850-61. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9153. View

11.

Huang R, Pan M, Wan C, Shah N, Tao X, Wei H . Physiological and transcriptional responses and cross protection of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 under acid stress. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 99(2):1002-1010. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2015-9993. View

12.

Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers O, Leer R . Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(4):1990-5. PMC: 149946. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0337704100. View

13.

Li P, Gu Q, Zhou Q . Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum LZ206, a potential probiotic strain with antimicrobial activity against food-borne pathogenic microorganisms. J Biotechnol. 2016; 238:52-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.09.012. View

14.

Li P, Li X, Gu Q, Lou X, Zhang X, Song D . Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 reveals its genetic adaptation and potential probiotic profiles. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2016; 17(8):569-79. PMC: 4980435. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1600176. View

15.

Gao D, Li Y, Zheng E, Liu N, Shao Z, Lu C . Eha, a regulator of Edwardsiella tarda, required for resistance to oxidative stress in macrophages. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016; 363(20). DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnw192. View

16.

Lowe T, Eddy S . tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25(5):955-64. PMC: 146525. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. View

17.

MCKUSICK V . Genomics: structural and functional studies of genomes. Genomics. 1998; 45(2):244-9. DOI: 10.1006/geno.1997.5020. View

18.

Mols M, van Kranenburg R, Tempelaars M, van Schaik W, Moezelaar R, Abee T . Comparative analysis of transcriptional and physiological responses of Bacillus cereus to organic and inorganic acid shocks. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009; 137(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.09.027. View

19.

Mujagic Z, de Vos P, Boekschoten M, Govers C, Pieters H, de Wit N . The effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on small intestinal barrier function and mucosal gene transcription; a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:40128. PMC: 5206730. DOI: 10.1038/srep40128. View

20.

OSullivan E, Condon S . Relationship between acid tolerance, cytoplasmic pH, and ATP and H+-ATPase levels in chemostat cultures of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999; 65(6):2287-93. PMC: 91338. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.6.2287-2293.1999. View