» Articles » PMID: 33724922

Efficacy of Face Masks Used in Uganda: A Laboratory-Based Inquiry During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2021 Mar 16
PMID 33724922
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With shortages of face masks being reported worldwide, it is critical to consider alternatives to commercially manufactured face masks. This study aimed to test and compare the efficacy of various makes of locally made or homemade cloth face masks obtained from face-mask vendors in Kampala, Uganda, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The testing was performed to assess the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE), breathability, distance-dependent fitness, and reusability of the locally made or homemade cloth face masks, while considering the most commonly used non-published face-mask decontamination approaches in Uganda. During laboratory experimentation, modified protocols from various face-mask testing organizations were adopted. Ten different face-mask types were experimented upon; each face-mask type was tested four times for every single test, except for the decontamination protocols involving washing where KN95 and surgical face masks were not included. Among the locally made or homemade cloth face masks, the double-layered cloth face masks (described as F) had better BFE and distance-dependent fitness characteristics, they could be reused, and had good breathability, than the other locally made or homemade cloth face masks. Despite these good qualities, the certainty of these face masks protecting wearers against COVID-19 remains subject to viral filtration efficiency testing.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting face mask-wearing behaviors to prevent COVID-19 among Thai people: A binary logistic regression model.

Kaewpan W, Rojpaisarnkit K, Pengpid S, Peltzer K Front Psychol. 2022; 13:996189.

PMID: 36425840 PMC: 9680842. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996189.


Individual and household risk factors for COVID-19 infection among household members of COVID-19 patients in home-based care in western Uganda, 2020.

Amanya G, Elyanu P, Migisha R, Kadobera D, Ario A, Harris J IJID Reg. 2022; 5:183-190.

PMID: 36407852 PMC: 9650255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2022.11.002.


Face Masks to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Processing, Roles, Requirements, Efficacy, Risk and Sustainability.

Rahman M, Hoque M, Alam M, Rouf M, Khan S, Xu H Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).

PMID: 35406172 PMC: 9003287. DOI: 10.3390/polym14071296.

References
1.
Chughtai A, Seale H, Islam M, Owais M, MacIntyre C . Policies on the use of respiratory protection for hospital health workers to protect from coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 105:103567. PMC: 7174826. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103567. View

2.
Cheng K, Lam T, Leung C . Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: altruism and solidarity. Lancet. 2020; 399(10336):e39-e40. PMC: 7162638. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30918-1. View

3.
Benson S, Novak D, Ogg M . Proper use of surgical n95 respirators and surgical masks in the OR. AORN J. 2013; 97(4):457-67. PMC: 7105909. DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.01.015. View

4.
Bae S, Kim M, Kim J, Cha H, Lim J, Jung J . Effectiveness of Surgical and Cotton Masks in Blocking SARS-CoV-2: A Controlled Comparison in 4 Patients. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 173(1):W22-W23. PMC: 7153751. DOI: 10.7326/M20-1342. View

5.
Rubio-Romero J, Pardo-Ferreira M, Torrecilla-Garcia J, Calero-Castro S . Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saf Sci. 2020; 129:104830. PMC: 7218384. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104830. View