» Articles » PMID: 33717982

Wearable Robotic Exoskeleton for Gait Reconstruction in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Literature Review

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33717982
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Wearable robotic exoskeletons (WREs) have been globally developed to achieve gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The present study aimed to enable evidence-based decision-making in selecting the optimal WRE according to residual motor function and to provide a new perspective on further development of appropriate WREs.

Methods: The current review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published from April 2015 to February 2020. Selected studies were analysed with a focus on the participants' neurological level of SCI, amount of training (number of training sessions and duration of the total training period), gait speed and endurance achieved, and subgroup exploration of the number of persons for assistance and the walking aid used among patients with cervical level injury.

Results: A total of 28 articles (nine using Ekso, three using Indego, ten using ReWalk, one using REX, five using Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor) involving 228 patients were included in the analysis. Across all WREs, T6 was the most frequently reported level of SCI. The amount of training showed a wide distribution (number of training sessions: 2-230 sessions [30-120 min per session]; duration of the total training period: 1-24 weeks [1-5 times per week]). The mean gait speed was 0.31 m/s (standard deviation [SD] 0.14), and the mean distance on the 6-min walking test as a measure of endurance was 108.9 m (SD 46.7). The subgroup exploration aimed at patients with cervical level injury indicated that 59.2% of patients were able to ambulate with no physical assistance and several patients used a walker as a walking aid.

Conclusion: The number of cervical level injury increased, as compared to the number previously indicated by a prior similar review. Training procedure was largely different among studies. Further improvement based on gait performance is required for use and dissemination in daily life.

The Translational Potential Of This Article: The present review reveals the current state of the clinical effectiveness of WREs for gait reconstruction in patients with SCI, contributing to evidence-based device application and further development.

Citing Articles

Immersive virtual reality for learning exoskeleton-like virtual walking: a feasibility study.

Rodriguez-Fernandez A, van den Berg A, Cucinella S, Lobo-Prat J, Font-Llagunes J, Marchal-Crespo L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):195.

PMID: 39487470 PMC: 11531127. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01482-y.


The Porous SilMA Hydrogel Scaffolds Carrying Dual-Sensitive Paclitaxel Nanoparticles Promote Neuronal Differentiation for Spinal Cord Injury Repair.

Li Z, Zhou T, Bao Z, Wu M, Mao Y Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024; 21(6):809-827.

PMID: 39004636 PMC: 11286913. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-024-00659-9.


Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Park J, Kim Y, Lee S, Shin J Ann Rehabil Med. 2024; 48(3):171-191.

PMID: 38950970 PMC: 11217760. DOI: 10.5535/arm.230039.


Exoskeleton rehabilitation robot training for balance and lower limb function in sub-acute stroke patients: a pilot, randomized controlled trial.

Zhang Y, Zhao W, Wan C, Wu X, Huang J, Wang X J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):98.

PMID: 38851703 PMC: 11162020. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01391-0.


Exoskeleton-based exercises for overground gait and balance rehabilitation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review of dose and dosage parameters.

Nepomuceno P, Souza W, Pakosh M, Musselman K, Craven B J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):73.

PMID: 38705999 PMC: 11070073. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01365-2.


References
1.
Jazayeri S, Beygi S, Shokraneh F, Hagen E, Rahimi-Movaghar V . Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(5):905-18. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3424-6. View

2.
Miller L, Zimmermann A, Herbert W . Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9:455-66. PMC: 4809334. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S103102. View

3.
Alamro R, Chisholm A, Williams A, Carpenter M, Lam T . Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elicits trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):109. PMC: 6245830. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0453-0. View

4.
Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, Cirnigliaro C, Agranova-Breyter I, Bauman W . Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015; 52(2):147-58. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0060. View

5.
Karimi M . Evidence-based evaluation of physiological effects of standing and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury. Iran J Med Sci. 2012; 36(4):242-53. PMC: 3470285. View